Oscar A. Saa v. Stuart Sherman

Filing 16

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John A. Kronstadt for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 14 . IT IS ORDERED that: the Petition is DENIED, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (efc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OSCAR A. SAA, Petitioner 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:18-cv-03233-JAK (GJS) v. STUART SHERMAN, Warden, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all 19 documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of 20 United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 14, “Report”], and Petitioner’s Objections to 21 the Report [Dkt. 15]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to 23 which objections have been stated. 24 Having completed its review, the Court concludes that nothing in the 25 Objections calls into question any aspect of the Report, nor does anything in the 26 Objections warrant discussion. The Court accepts the findings and 27 recommendations set forth in the Report. 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?