Oscar A. Saa v. Stuart Sherman

Filing 16

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John A. Kronstadt for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 14 . IT IS ORDERED that: the Petition is DENIED, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (efc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

OSCAR A. SAA,
Petitioner

12
13
14
15

Case No. 2:18-cv-03233-JAK (GJS)

v.
STUART SHERMAN, Warden,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

Respondent.

16
17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all

19

documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of

20

United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 14, “Report”], and Petitioner’s Objections to

21

the Report [Dkt. 15]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P.

22

72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to

23

which objections have been stated.

24

Having completed its review, the Court concludes that nothing in the

25

Objections calls into question any aspect of the Report, nor does anything in the

26

Objections warrant discussion. The Court accepts the findings and

27

recommendations set forth in the Report.

28