Salvador Flores v. City of Pasadena et al

Filing 139

ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal, 138 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having read and considered t he stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED as follows: All claims as against all parties in this action shall be and hereby are dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SALVADOR FLORES, an Individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CITY OF PASADENA, a Municipal ) Entity, CORPORAL SUSAN GOMEZ, ) OFFICER THOMAS BUTLER, ) OFFICER RAPHAEL SANTIAGO, ) and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 2:18-cv-03792-DDP-JCx Honorable Dean D. Pregerson ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having read and considered the stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED as follows: All claims as against all parties in this action shall be and hereby are dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 2, 2020 24 25 26 DEAN D. PREGERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?