Salvador Flores v. City of Pasadena et al
Filing
139
ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal, 138 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having read and considered t he stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED as follows: All claims as against all parties in this action shall be and hereby are dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SALVADOR FLORES, an Individual, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
CITY OF PASADENA, a Municipal )
Entity, CORPORAL SUSAN GOMEZ, )
OFFICER THOMAS BUTLER,
)
OFFICER RAPHAEL SANTIAGO,
)
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 2:18-cv-03792-DDP-JCx
Honorable Dean D. Pregerson
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having read and considered the stipulation, and
good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
All claims as against all parties in this action shall be and hereby are
dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 2, 2020
24
25
26
DEAN D. PREGERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?