Abryanna Howard v. Starbucks Corporation et al

Filing 20

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 19 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Further, all parties are to bear their own costs and fees incurred in this instant action. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 ABRYANNA HOWARD, an individual, Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 Case No. 2:18-CV-03915-AB-PLA ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) District Judge: Hon. Andre Birotte, Jr. Magistrate Judge: Hon. Paul Abrams 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41 (A)(1)(A)(II) 1 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 2 case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil 3 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Further, all parties are to bear their own costs and 4 fees incurred in this instant action. 5 6 7 Dated: February 5, 2020 _____________________________ Hon. Andre Birotte, Jr. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41 (A)(1)(A)(II)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?