Izaz Khan v. Mark Bradley et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H. Wu, re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), 6 . More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. (see attached) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)

Download PDF
JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IZAZ KHAN, CASE NUMBER CV 18-4733 GW (FFM) V. Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s), DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH PARKING LOT, I et al., ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND The Court previously received from QPlaintiffs)/Petitioner(s) u Defendant(s)/Respondent(s): an IFP Request with no accompanying Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal. ~ a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request or payment of the filing fees. ~ a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal with a partial filing fee payment for an amount less than the required $400. The Court sent a warning letter to ~x Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) u Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this Ease. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED L►~' DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. u REMANDED to the accepted under this case number. No further findings shall be IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ~ ~ ~(~~~f United States District Judge IFP-10(05/18) ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?