Slade Douglas v. Employment Development Department of the State of California et al

Filing 45

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Plaintiff Slade Douglas shall take nothing from Defendant the Employment Development Department; and 2. Plaintiff's action against the Employment Development Department is dismissed. (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 2:18-cv-04767-RGK-AFM SLADE DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT v. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Judge: R. Gary Klausner Courtroom: 850 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT (Case No. 2:18-cv-04767-RGK-AFM) 1 On April 30, 2019, the Court granted Defendant State of California’s, acting 2 by and through the Employment Development Department, motion for judgment on 3 the pleadings, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), against all of 4 Plaintiff Slade Douglas’s causes of action. As a result of the Court’s order granting 5 the motion and dismissing Plaintiff’s causes of action against the Employment 6 Development Department, 7 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 8 1. 9 10 11 Plaintiff Slade Douglas shall take nothing from Defendant the Employment Development Department; and 2. Plaintiff’s action against the Employment Development Department is dismissed. 12 13 14 DATED: May 23, 2019 15 16 17 _____________________________________________ R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT (Case No. 2:18-cv-04767-RGK-AFM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?