Slade Douglas v. Employment Development Department of the State of California et al
Filing
45
JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Plaintiff Slade Douglas shall take nothing from Defendant the Employment Development Department; and 2. Plaintiff's action against the Employment Development Department is dismissed. (lom)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 2:18-cv-04767-RGK-AFM
SLADE DOUGLAS,
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
v.
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA; DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
Judge:
R. Gary Klausner
Courtroom: 850
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT (Case No. 2:18-cv-04767-RGK-AFM)
1
On April 30, 2019, the Court granted Defendant State of California’s, acting
2
by and through the Employment Development Department, motion for judgment on
3
the pleadings, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), against all of
4
Plaintiff Slade Douglas’s causes of action. As a result of the Court’s order granting
5
the motion and dismissing Plaintiff’s causes of action against the Employment
6
Development Department,
7
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
8
1.
9
10
11
Plaintiff Slade Douglas shall take nothing from Defendant the
Employment Development Department; and
2.
Plaintiff’s action against the Employment Development Department is
dismissed.
12
13
14
DATED: May 23, 2019
15
16
17
_____________________________________________
R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT (Case No. 2:18-cv-04767-RGK-AFM)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?