Cassidy Marsh v. The Procter and Gamble Paper Products Company et al

Filing 21

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(D) AND (E) CLAWBACK ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real: The Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Protective Order and Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e) Order ("Protective Order") 19 and HEREBY ORDERS that the above Protective Order is entered and approved by the Court for use in the case. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA- WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 17 CASSIDY MARSH, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and as an “aggrieved employee” on behalf of other “aggrieved employees” under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, 18 Plaintiff(s), 14 15 16 19 22 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(D) AND (E) CLAWBACK ORDER Hon. Manuel L. Real U.S. District Judge Roybal, Courtroom 880 vs. 20 21 Case No.: 2:18-cv-04944-R-E THE PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY, an Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 23 24 Defendant(s). 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO.: 2:18-CV-04944-R-E ORDER 1 2 Good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties’ Joint 3 Stipulation for Protective Order and Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e) Order 4 (“Protective Order”) and HEREBY ORDERS that the above Protective Order is 5 entered and approved by the Court for use in the above-captioned case. 6 7 Dated: July 16, 2018 8 HON. MANUEL REAL U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101.3577 619.232.0441 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO.: 2:18-CV-04944-R-E

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?