Cassidy Marsh v. The Procter and Gamble Paper Products Company et al
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(D) AND (E) CLAWBACK ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real: The Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Protective Order and Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e) Order ("Protective Order") 19 and HEREBY ORDERS that the above Protective Order is entered and approved by the Court for use in the case. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA- WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
17
CASSIDY MARSH, on behalf of
himself, and all others similarly
situated, and as an “aggrieved
employee” on behalf of other
“aggrieved employees” under the
Labor Code Private Attorneys General
Act of 2004,
18
Plaintiff(s),
14
15
16
19
22
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER AND FEDERAL RULE OF
EVIDENCE 502(D) AND (E)
CLAWBACK ORDER
Hon. Manuel L. Real
U.S. District Judge
Roybal, Courtroom 880
vs.
20
21
Case No.: 2:18-cv-04944-R-E
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER
PRODUCTS COMPANY, an Ohio
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
23
24
Defendant(s).
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
501 W. Broadway
Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101.3577
619.232.0441
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:18-CV-04944-R-E
ORDER
1
2
Good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties’ Joint
3
Stipulation for Protective Order and Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e) Order
4
(“Protective Order”) and HEREBY ORDERS that the above Protective Order is
5
entered and approved by the Court for use in the above-captioned case.
6
7
Dated: July 16, 2018
8
HON. MANUEL REAL
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
501 W. Broadway
Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101.3577
619.232.0441
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:18-CV-04944-R-E
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?