Citizens Commission on Human Rights v. United States Food and Drug Administration

Filing 35

DISMISSAL ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 34 . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the separately filed stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the issue of attorneys fees. All pending motions are hereby taken off calendar and now moot. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 WESTERN DIVISION 13 14 CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. No. CV 18-05320 CBM (JPRx) DISMISSAL ORDER [JS-6] Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall 1 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the 2 separately filed stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed. The Court shall retain 3 jurisdiction over the issue of attorney’s fees. All pending motions are hereby taken off 4 calendar and now moot. 5 6 7 ________________________________ Consuelo B. Marshall United States District Judge Dated: January 8, 2020 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?