Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. P.J. Salvage et al
Filing
55
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth.(NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT): re Notice of Lodging 53 . (sbou)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Paul M. Gelb (SBN 214439)
Paul.Gelb@dbr.com
Zoë K. Wilhelm (SBN 305932)
Zoe.Wilhelm@dbr.com
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1800 Century Park East, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, California 90067-1517
Telephone: (310) 203-4000
Facsimile: (310) 229-1285
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
Attorneys for Defendants
P.J. SALVAGE, WUNDIES ENTERPRISES,
INC., ANDRA GROUP L.P., BLUM’S
SWIMWEAR AND INTIMATE APPAREL,
CENTURY 21 DEPARTMENT STORES, LLC,
DILLARD’S INC., AND NORDSTROM, INC.
James W. Spertus (SBN 159825)
Jim@spertuslaw.com
Ezra D. Landes (SBN 253052)
Ezra@spertuslaw.com
SPERTUS, LANDES & UMHOFER, LLP
1990 S. Bundy Drive, Suite 705
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 826-4700
Facsimile: (310) 826-4711
Attorneys for Defendants
AMAZON.COM, INC., LORD & TAYLOR,
LLC, MACY’S INC., AND ZAPPOS IP, INC.
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
KLAUBER BROTHERS, INC., a New
York corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
P.J. SALVAGE, a business entity of
form unknown; WUNDIES
ENTERPRISES, INC., a New Jersey
Corporation; ANDRA GROUP L.P.,
individually and doing business as
“HerRoom.com,” a Texas Limited
Partnership; AMAZON.COM, INC., a
Washington Corporation; BLUM’S
SWIMWEAR AND INTIMATE
APPAREL, a business entity of form
Case No. 2:18-cv-05470-MWF-JPR
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE
ORDER REGARDING
CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
Magistrate Judge: Hon. Jean P.
Rosenbluth
Courtroom: Courtroom 690
Complaint Filed: June 19, 2018
First Amended Complaint Filed:
November 20, 2018
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
unknown; THE BRA GENIE, a business
entity of form unknown; CENTURY 21
DEPARTMENT STORES, LLC, a New
York Limited Liability Company;
DILLARD’S INC., and Arkansas
Corporation; LORD & TAYLOR, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company;
MACY’S INC., individually and doing
business as “Bloomingdale’s”, a
Delaware Corporation; NORDSTROM,
INC., a Washington Corporation;
ZAPPOS IP, INC., individually and
doing business as “Zappos.com” and
“6pm.com,” and DOES 1 through 10,
Defendants.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Klauber Brothers, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a lawsuit
2
against defendants P.J. Salvage, Wundies Enterprises, Inc., Andra Group L.P.,
3
Blum’s Swimwear and Intimate Apparel, Century 21 Department Stores, LLC,
4
Dillard’s Inc., Nordstrom, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Lord & Taylor, LLC, Macy’s
5
Inc., and Zappos IP, Inc. (“Defendants”) titled Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. P.J.
6
Salvage, et al., 2:18-cv-05470-MWF-JPR (the “Action”).
7
8
9
10
WHEREAS, Plaintiff, by and through counsel of record, has requested
copies of confidential records;
WHEREAS, the aforementioned documents contain sensitive and
proprietary confidential business information;
11
The following Stipulation and Protective Order is agreed to between the
12
Parties, by and through their counsel, regarding the production of confidential
13
information without prejudice to any party’s position concerning any issue:
14
1.
BINDING EFFECT
15
The following procedures shall govern the handling, examination, review and
16
use of Confidential information (as herein defined) during the course of the
17
proceedings in this Action. Furthermore, this stipulation shall take effect
18
immediately upon the parties’ joint execution of this stipulation, pending the
19
Court’s approval of the proposed protective order or an order of the same or similar
20
effect. Should the Court refuse or fail to enter such an order, the Plaintiff and
21
Defendants nonetheless agree to comply with the terms of this stipulation as to any
22
and all Confidential information disclosed or shared.
23
2.
24
As used herein, “Producing Party” shall refer to any person or entity
25
producing information or documents in connection with this litigation. As used
26
herein, “Confidential” information shall mean any information subject to the right
27
to privacy of any individual or entity, and designated as such by any Producing
28
Party as provided herein. Any testimony, information, document or thing produced
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
in connection with this litigation may be designated as “confidential” by such
2
Producing Party at the time such Producing Party produces or provides that
3
testimony, information, document or thing.
4
5
6
3.
ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS AND
INFORMATION BY COUNSEL AND PARTIES
As used herein, Plaintiff and Defendants are collectively referenced as the
7
“Parties” and Plaintiff and Defendants each is referenced as a “Party.” As used
8
herein, the term “Qualified Person” means: (a) the Court and necessary Court
9
personnel, including stenographic reporters engaged in such proceedings as are
10
necessary incident to preparation for trial, trial of the Action, or any appeal of the
11
Action; (b) counsel for any Party, and the paralegal, stenographic, clerical and
12
secretarial personnel employed by such counsel; (c) any Party; (d) non-Party
13
experts or consultants (together with their associates, consultants and clerical and
14
secretarial staff) retained in this Action to assist in prosecution, defense, settlement
15
or other disposition of the Action; (e) any other person to whom the Producing
16
Party has consented to disclosure in advance and in writing, on notice to each Party
17
hereto.
18
Confidential documents and information contained therein shall be made
19
available only to a Qualified Person as provided herein. No Qualified Person who
20
gains access to Confidential documents may disclose the contents or information
21
contained in them to any person not a Qualified Person, without the advance written
22
approval of the Parties, as provided by this Protective Order, or by order of this
23
Court after properly noticed motion. This protective order does not govern trial or
24
related proceedings. The parties must separately seek an order from the Court at
25
the appropriate time concerning the use of confidential material at trial.
26
27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
4.
ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS AND
INFORMATION BY EXPERTS AND CONSULTANTS
Independent expert witnesses who may testify at trial and/or nontestifying
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
experts retained by any party shall be informed by the party of the terms of this
2
Order and such party shall provide a copy thereof to the expert and request and
3
obtain the expert’s written consent to be bound by this Protective Order or any
4
protective order governing trial.
5
6
5.
DISCLOSURES TO PERSONS OTHER THAN “QUALIFIED
PERSONS”
7
In the event that a party desires to disclose to any person other than a
8
Qualified Person, any Confidential documents and information contained therein,
9
counsel for that party shall give at least fourteen (14) written days notice to the
10
designating party giving the identity, name, address and occupation of each person
11
to whom such disclosure is desired and the documents that would be disclosed.
12
The designated party may serve by facsimile a written objection to such disclosures
13
to requesting counsel, but failure to serve any objection does not constitute waiver
14
of right to object, nor does it tacitly imply agreement. Absent agreement, any such
15
objections shall be resolved by the Court, on properly noticed Motion under Local
16
Rule 37 by the party seeking production of the document to Non-Qualified Persons.
17
Upon any production to a Non-Qualified Person, whether by agreement, order or
18
otherwise, the party providing the Confidential documents or information contained
19
therein shall provide a copy of the Protective Order to said persons to whom
20
disclosure is made.
21
6.
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION
22
Confidential documents and information contained therein may be used
23
solely for the purposes of this Action and for no other purposes. The use of any
24
Confidential document or information contained therein at deposition in this lawsuit
25
is subject to all preceding and succeeding paragraphs, including, but not limited to,
26
that Confidential documents and information contained therein shall not be
27
provided at the deposition of a non-Qualified Person, unless by agreement of all
28
counsel, or Court Order, or other operation of this Agreement.
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
2
3
7.
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION IN
THIS LAWSUIT.
Where Confidential documents and information contained therein are
4
permitted to be used at deposition, all portions of transcripts of such depositions
5
and exhibits thereto which refer or relate to such Confidential documents and
6
information contained therein shall themselves be considered as Confidential
7
documents and information. The parties shall take all necessary steps to insure
8
confidential portions of the transcripts and exhibits are preserved. In addition, the
9
deponent, whether or not a Qualified Person, shall be instructed by the producing
10
party, that he or she may not divulge any Confidential documents and information
11
except to Qualified Persons.
12
8.
13
All Confidential documents and information contained therein, which are
14
FILING AND SEALING
filed with the Court shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.
15
9.
16
At the conclusion of the action, all Confidential documents and copies
17
thereof either (i) shall be returned to counsel for the designated party who produced
18
such documents and information, or (ii) shall be destroyed. If any such
19
Confidential documents or information contained therein are furnished to any
20
expert, consultant, or to any other person, in accordance with this Stipulation and
21
Protective Order, counsel for the party who provided such information to the
22
expert, consultant, or to the other person shall insure that all Confidential
23
documents and information be returned to counsel for the designated party to whom
24
the documents belong, or shall be destroyed. If destroyed, certification thereof shall
25
be provided to opposing counsel. Nothing in the Stipulation and Protective Order
26
shall require the return or destruction of pleadings, court papers or other documents
27
which are not Confidential documents and information which are in the public
28
domain.
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DISPOSAL AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE ACTION
6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
10.
AMENDMENTS
2
Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to prohibit or prejudice
3
any party to this litigation from seeking amendments broadening or restricting the
4
rights of access to and use of Confidential documents and information, or from
5
contesting the designation of Confidential Document and information or the right of
6
a person to be treated as a Qualified Person as provided herein.
7
11.
NO WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE
8
All parties acknowledge that the speed by which these documents were
9
produced might result in the inadvertent production of documents that are subject to
10
the attorney-client and/or work product privileges. Accordingly, all of the parties
11
herein agree that no waiver of any privileges will result from the production of any
12
Confidential documents which are in fact privileged. If any privileged documents
13
were discovered, they would be returned to the producing party.
14
15
16
12.
NO RESTRICTIONS ON DOCUMENTS OR INFORMATION
FROM OTHER SOURCES
Nothing in this Protective Order shall be deemed to prevent any party from
17
using any documents or information contained therein for any purpose, if such
18
documents or information contained therein are in any manner identical, similar or
19
related to the documents produced pursuant to this Stipulation and Protective Order
20
as long as such documents or information was not obtained from the exchange of
21
documents set forth herein.
22
13.
DISPUTES REGARDING DESIGNATION
23
If a Party disputes the designation of Information as being Confidential, that
24
Party shall advise the other Parties in writing of the objection, and the Party
25
designating the Information as being Confidential shall within ten (10) days set
26
forth the basis in writing for the designation. If the dispute cannot be
27
resolved, the Party objecting to the Confidential designation shall bear the
28
burden of applying to the Court for the entry of an appropriate Order with the
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
7
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
designating party bearing the burden of persuasion. All documents designated
2
Confidential shall remain so designated until they are redesignated by written
3
agreement of counsel or the issue is resolved by the Court.
4
[Signatures on the Following Page]
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
8
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
1
Dated: January 31, 2019
Respectfully submitted,
2
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
3
By:
4
5
/s/ Paul M. Gelb
Paul M. Gelb
Zoë K. Wilhelm
Attorneys for Defendants
P.J. SALVAGE, WUNDIES
ENTERPRISES, INC., ANDRA
GROUP L.P., BLUM’S SWIMWEAR
AND INTIMATE APPAREL,
CENTURY 21 DEPARTMENT
STORES, LLC, DILLARD’S INC.,
AND NORDSTROM, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: January 31, 2019
SPERTUS, LANDES & UMHOFER,
LLP
12
By:
13
14
/s/ Ezra D. Landes
James W. Spertus
Ezra D. Landes
Attorneys for Defendants
AMAZON.COM, INC., LORD &
TAYLOR, LLC, MACY’S INC., AND
ZAPPOS IP, INC.
15
16
17
18
Dated: January 31, 2019
DONIGER / BURROUGHS
19
By:
20
21
22
/s/ Trevor W. Barrett
Stephen M. Doniger
Scott Alan Burroughs
Trevor W. Barrett
Justin M. Gomes
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KLAUBER BROTHERS, INC.
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of February, 2019.
26
27
28
DRINKER BIDDLE &
REATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
Honorable Jean P. Rosenbluth
United States Magistrate Judge
9
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?