Donna Benson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 35

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court having approved the parties stipulation to remand this case pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with that stipulation and for entry of judgment for Plaintiff, judgment is hereby entered for Plaintiff. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 34 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney DAVID M. HARRIS Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division CEDINA M. KIM Assistant United States Attorney Senior Trial Attorney, Civil Division JENNIFER LEE TARN, CSBN 240609 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8825 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: Jennifer.Tarn@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 14 15 16 DONNA BENSON, 17 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 21 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 22 Defendant. 23 24 ) 2:18-cv-05492-MRW ) ) JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 25 26 27 28 1 Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 405(g)(action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security). -1- 1 The Court having approved the parties’ stipulation to remand this case 2 pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent 3 with that stipulation and for entry of judgment for Plaintiff, judgment is hereby 4 entered for Plaintiff. 5 6 7 8 DATED: HONORABLE MICHAEL R. WILNER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?