Jesse Roman v. S. Franco et al
Filing
14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND OBEY COURT ORDERS by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and obey court orders. Plaintiff must file a written response by no later than October 25, 2019. (kh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.: 2:18-05669 PA (ADS)
Date: October 4, 2019
Title: Jesse Max Roman v. S. Franco, et al.
Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge
Kristee Hopkins
Deputy Clerk
None Reported
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
None Present
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE AND OBEY COURT ORDERS
On June 27, 2018, Plaintiff Jesse Max Roman, previously a prisoner at the
Federal Correctional Institute, Mendota and the Santa Ana Jail, filed a civil rights
Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [Dkt. No. 1]. On July 17, 2019, the Court dismissed
the Complaint with leave to amend and ordered Plaintiff to file a First Amended
Complaint by no later than August 9, 2019. [Dkt. No. 11]. On August 8, 2019, Plaintiff
filed a Motion for Extension of Time to respond to the Order Dismissing with Leave to
Amend. [Dkt. No. 12]. The Court granted the Motion for Extension of Time and
ordered that Plaintiff file a response by no later than September 9, 2019. [Dkt. No. 13].
As of the date of this order, the Court has not received a First Amended Complaint or
any response to the Order Dismissing with Leave to Amend from Plaintiff.
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not
be dismissed for failure to prosecute and obey court orders. Plaintiff must file
a written response by no later than October 25, 2019. Plaintiff may respond to this
Order to Show Cause by (a) filing a First Amended Complaint; or (b) filing a statement
with the Court indicating the desire to continue to move forward with the Complaint
despite the weaknesses noted by the Court in the Order Dismissing with Leave to
Amend.
CV-90 (03/15) – YWD
Civil Minutes – General
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.: 2:18-05669 PA (ADS)
Date: October 4, 2019
Title: Jesse Max Roman v. S. Franco, et al.
Plaintiff is expressly warned that failure to timely file a response to this Order to
Show Cause may result in a recommendation to the District Judge that this action be
dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and obey Court orders pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Clerk kh
CV-90 (03/15) – YWD
Civil Minutes – General
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?