Rachel Scanlon et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al

Filing 325

SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT, 304 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs, Ssteven Sawyer, Rachel Scanlon, K. X. and G. X., take nothing from Defendants County of Los Angeles, Lourdes Olarte, and Marisol Gon zalez, and that said Defendants are the prevailing parties in the action. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants County of Los Angeles, Lourdes Olarte and Marisol Gonzalez and against Plaintiffs Steven Sawyer, Rachel Scanlon, K.X. and G.X. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)

Case 2:18-cv-07759-CBM-AS Document 325 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:7722

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RACHEL SCANLON, et al,
Plaintiffs,

12
13

vs.

14

Case No.: CV 18-7759 CBM (ASx)
SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al,
Defendants.

15
16

Based upon the jury verdict in favor of Defendants Lourdes Olarte and

17

Marisol Gonzalez on July 23, 2021, and based upon the Court’s previous granting

18

of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 191), on May 21, 2021:

19

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs,

20

Steven Sawyer, Rachel Scanlon, K.X. and G.X., take nothing from Defendants

21

County of Los Angeles, Lourdes Olarte, and Marisol Gonzalez, and that said

22

Defendants are the prevailing parties in the action.

23

///

24
25
26
27
28

///
///
///
1

Case 2:18-cv-07759-CBM-AS Document 325 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:7723

1

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants County of Los Angeles,

2

Lourdes Olarte and Marisol Gonzalez and against Plaintiffs Steven Sawyer,

3

Rachel Scanlon, K.X. and G.X. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, 58.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

DATED: September 8, 2021

8
9
10

CONSUELO B. MARSHALL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2