James Carter, Jr. v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 24

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge George H. Wu for Amended Report and Recommendation (Issued) 22 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation, [Dkt. No. 22], is accepted; 2. The case is dismissed with prejudice; and 3. Judgment is to be entered accordingly. (see document for further details) (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES C.1, an Individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. Case No.: 2:18-9230 GW (ADS) 14 15 ANDREW M. SAUL2, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the 18 19 records and files herein, including the Joint Stipulation [Dkt. No. 16], the Report and 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 2 Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security). 1 -1- 1 Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge dated December 12, 2 2019 [Dkt. No. 19], Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation filed on 3 December 19, 2019 [Dkt. No. 20], the Amended Report and Recommendation of the 4 assigned United States Magistrate Judge dated February 24, 2020 [Dkt. No. 22], and 5 Plaintiff’s Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation filed on March 9, 6 7 8 9 2020 [Dkt No. 23]. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which objections were filed. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 11 1. The United States Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report and Recommendation, [Dkt. No. 22], is accepted; 12 13 2. The case is dismissed with prejudice; and 14 3. Judgment is to be entered accordingly. 15 16 DATE: November 18, 2020 17 18 THE HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?