Richard Scott Brooks v. Scott Freunheim et al

Filing 47

ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 46 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 O 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 RICHARD SCOTT BROOKS, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, v. SCOTT FREUNHEIM, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-10506-JAK-KES ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 15 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the 18 other records on file herein, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the U.S. 19 Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 46). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of 20 those portions of the original Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 44) to which 21 objections (Dkt. 45) have been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and 22 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. 25 26 27 28 February 18, 2021 DATED: ___________________ ____________________________________ John A. Kronstadt UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?