A.C.C.S. et al v. Kirstjen M. Nielsen et al

Filing 69

ORDER APPROVING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court hereby APPROVES the Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) ("Stipulation&quo t;) 68 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all of Plaintiffs' claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. Nothing in this judgment shall have any preclusive effect on A.C.C.S.'s family member for whom A.C.C.S. filed a derivative U-visa petition, who is not a party to this action and does not have any claims under Plaintiffs' Complaint. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

11
12

A.C.C.S., et al.,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs,
v.
CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary,
Department of Homeland Security,
et al.,
Defendants.

Case No.: CV 18-10759-DMG (MRWx)
ORDER APPROVING VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FED.
R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) [68]

1

The Court, having read and considered the Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (“Stipulation”), hereby

3

APPROVES the Stipulation.

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

All of Plaintiffs’ claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice, with

6

each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. Nothing in this

7

judgment shall have any preclusive effect on A.C.C.S.’s family member for whom

8

A.C.C.S. filed a derivative U-visa petition, who is not a party to this action and

9

does not have any claims under Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: November 17, 2020

_______________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE