A.M. v. County of Los Angeles, et al

Filing 36

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 35 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. *NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT.* (es)

Download PDF
NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 A.M., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, CANDICE WADLEY, Plaintiff(s), 14 15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CASE NO. 2:19-cv-2100 JWH-PLAx ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity; LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, a public entity; MARICA THOMPSON, an individual; NANCY RAMIREZ, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, 23 Defendant(s) 24 25 26 27 /// /// 28 –1– ORDER JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 Having considered the parties’ Joint [PROPOSED] Stipulation Regarding 2 Protective Order Governing Production of Confidential Information and good 3 cause 4 Confidential Information designated in this case. appearing, is ordered that the Joint Stipulation govern the 5 6 DATED: October 14, 2020 7 8 9 10 ______________________________________ HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– ORDER JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?