A.M. v. County of Los Angeles, et al
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 35 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. *NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT.* (es)
NOTE CHANGES MADE BY
THE COURT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
A.M., a minor, by and through her
Guardian ad Litem, CANDICE
WADLEY,
Plaintiff(s),
14
15
v.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-2100 JWH-PLAx
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION REGARDING
PROTECTIVE ORDER
GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a
public entity; LOS ANGELES
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
CHILDREN AND FAMILY
SERVICES, a public entity;
MARICA THOMPSON, an
individual; NANCY RAMIREZ, an
individual; and DOES 1 through 10,
Inclusive,
23
Defendant(s)
24
25
26
27
///
///
28
–1–
ORDER JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
Having considered the parties’ Joint [PROPOSED] Stipulation Regarding
2
Protective Order Governing Production of Confidential Information and good
3
cause
4
Confidential Information designated in this case.
appearing,
is
ordered
that
the
Joint
Stipulation
govern
the
5
6
DATED: October 14, 2020
7
8
9
10
______________________________________
HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–
ORDER JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?