Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Elart Miguel Coello, et al

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS ELART MIGUEL COELLO AND TAKATIS INC, 35 by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Innovative SportsManagement, Inc. d/b/ a Integrated Sports Media, and Defendants ELART MIGUELCOELLO and TAKATIS, INC. that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed withprejudice against ELART MIGUEL COELLO and TAKATIS, INC. This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. First Library Square 1114 Fremont Avenue South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227 Tel: 626-799-9797 Fax: 626-799-9795 TPRLAW@att.net Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, CASE NO. 2:19-cv-04437-TJH-PLAx 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 15 Elart Miguel Coello, et al, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS ELART MIGUEL COELLO AND TAKATIS, INC. JS-6 16 Defendants. 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Innovative Sports 18 19 Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, and Defendants ELART MIGUEL 20 21 22 COELLO and TAKATIS, INC. that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed with prejudice against ELART MIGUEL COELLO and TAKATIS, INC. 23 /// 24 25 26 /// /// 27 28 /// ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:19-cv-04437-TJH-PLA PAGE 1 1 This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). 2 3 Each Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: 7 8 9 Dated: JANUARY 7, 2021 10 11 12 13 The Honorable Terry J. Hatter, Jr United States District Court Central District of California /// 14 15 16 /// /// 17 18 19 /// /// 20 /// 21 22 23 /// /// 24 25 26 /// /// 27 28 /// ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:19-cv-04437-TJH-PLA PAGE 2 1 PROOF OF SERVICE (SERVICE BY MAIL) 2 3 4 I declare that: I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, California. I am over the 5 age of eighteen years and not a party to the within cause; my business address is First 6 Library Square, 1114 Fremont Avenue, South Pasadena, California 91030. I am 7 readily familiar with this law firm's practice for collection and processing of 8 correspondence/documents for mail in the ordinary course of business. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 On December 31, 2020, I caused to serve the following documents entitled: [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS ELART MIGUEL COELLO AND TAKATIS, INC. On all parties in said cause by mailing same to the defendant’s counsel at the following address(es): 16 17 18 19 Mr. L. Walker Van Antwerp, III, Esquire (Attorneys for Elart Miguel Coello L. WALKER VAN ANTWERP LAW OFFICES and Takatis, Inc.) 523 West 6th Street, Suite 712 Los Angeles, CA 90071 20 21 I declare under the penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States 22 that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on 23 December 31, 2020, at South Pasadena, California 24 25 26 Dated: December 31, 2020 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:19-cv-04437-TJH-PLA PAGE 3 /s/Leticia Estrada LETICIA ESTRADA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?