Shonna Counter v. Public Storage et al

Filing 41

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: On 12/27/2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution 39 . A written response to the Order to Sho w Cause was ordered to be filed no later than 1/5/2022. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Case No.: 2:19-cv-04792-AB (ASx)
Shonna Counter,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff,
v.
Public Storage, a Real Estate
Investment Trust; and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

On December 27, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case
should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Dkt. No. 39). A written response to
the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than January 5, 2022. No
response having been filed to the Court’s Order to Show Cause,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed,
without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of
the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41.
Dated: January 6, 2022

_______________________________________
HON. ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1.