Rafik Shanazari v. United States Postal Service
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/18/2019. (wm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
RAFIK SHANAZARI V. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Proceedings (In Chambers):
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel/party show cause in writing on or before October 18, 2019 why
this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following as
an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal
of the entire action.
Plaintiff to file Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint.
Defendant to file a Response to Complaint (Amended Complaint) along with Notice of Interested
Parties pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1 OR Plaintiff to file a Request for Entry of Default.
REMOVALS: Defendant to file copy of Response filed in state court with proper title page, as
instructed on the Court’s Standing Order, along with a Notice of Interested Parties (if not already
filed) pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1 OR Plaintiff to file a Request for Entry of Default.
Plaintiff to file a Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment.
Plaintiff to file a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment.
Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral argument will not
be heard in this matter unless so ordered by the Court.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.5, one mandatory chambers copy of every electronically filed document must
be delivered no later than 12:00 p.m. on the following business day. Further, the mandatory chambers copy
shall comply with Local Rule 11-3.
Initials of Preparer: wm
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?