Malcolm Pye-Williams v. Walgreen Co. et al
Filing
18
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In light of the parties' Notice of Settlement 17 , the Court orders that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 45 days from the date of this Order. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (SEE CIVIL MINUTES FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.
LA CV19-06237 JAK (GJSx)
Title
Malcolm Pye-Williams v. Walgreen Co. et al
Present: The Honorable
Date
October 8, 2019
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Andrea Keifer
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
In light of the parties’ Notice of Settlement, the Court orders that the action is dismissed without
prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 45 days
from the date of this Order; provided, however, any request by any party(ies) that the Court do so, shall
make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 45-day
period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party(ies) making such a
request reasonably expect the process to be concluded. This Order does not preclude the filing of a
stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require the
approval of the Court. Such a stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 45-day period, or by
such later date ordered by the Court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms the
requirements of a showing of good cause stated above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
ak
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?