Premera Blue Cross v. Cari Passmore

Filing 80

[VACATED PER COURT ORDER, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 82] JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. Judgment shall be, and hereby is, ENTERED in favor of the plaintiff, Premera Blue Cross (Premera), and against the defendant, Cari Passmore (Passmore). Passmore shall pay to Premera the sum of $50,000, with annual interest accruing at a rate of 10% on any unpaid balance from the end of any cure period as set forth in Section 6 of the parties' private settlement agreement, which is incorporated here by this reference. 5. Upon satisfaction of the terms of the parties' settlement, Premera shall file in this action a notice of satisfaction. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) Modified on 6/30/2021 (mrgo).

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
Jeffrey S. Gleason (pro hac vice)
Nathaniel J. Moore (Cal. Bar # 277206)
Charlie Gokey (pro hac vice)
800 LaSalle Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
T: [phone]
F: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
David Martinez (Cal. Bar # 193183)
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, California 90067-3208
T: [phone]
F: [phone]
[e-mail]

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Premera Blue Cross,
Plaintiff,
v.
Cari Passmore,
Defendant.

Case No. 2:19-cv-07169-GW
STIPULATED JUDGMENT

1

Premera Blue Cross and Cari Passmore, having reached a settlement in this

2

matter without admission of liability, jointly stipulate to, and request that the Court

3

enter, judgment in the above-captioned case as follows.
FINAL JUDGMENT

4
5

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

6

1.

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant

7

to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive

8

of interest and costs, and the parties are citizens of different states.

9

2.

This Court further has personal jurisdiction over Cari Passmore, and may

10

enter judgment against her consistent with Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 410.10 and due

11

process under the U.S. Constitution.

12
13
14

3.

The Complaint in this action states a claim upon which relief may be

granted as to all Counts.
4.

Judgment shall be, and hereby is, ENTERED in favor of the plaintiff,

15

Premera Blue Cross (“Premera”), and against the defendant, Cari Passmore

16

(“Passmore”). Passmore shall pay to Premera the sum of $50,000, with annual interest

17

accruing at a rate of 10% on any unpaid balance from the end of any cure period as

18

set forth in Section 6 of the parties’ private settlement agreement, which is

19

incorporated here by this reference.

20
21
22
23
24

5.

Upon satisfaction of the terms of the parties’ settlement, Premera shall

file in this action a notice of satisfaction.
6.

Upon the filing of the notice contemplated in paragraph 5, this Final

Judgment shall be converted to a dismissal with prejudice.
7.

The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly.

25
26
27
28
2

1

SO ORDERED this 15th day of March, 2021.

2

______________________________
Hon. George H. Wu
United States District Judge
Central District of California

3
4
5
6

STIPULATED AND AGREED on March 11, 2021 by:

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP

CARI PASSMORE

/s/ David Martinez
_
Jeffrey S. Gleason (pro hac vice)
Jamie R. Kurtz (pro hac vice)
Nathaniel Moore (Cal. Bar # 277206)
Charlie Gokey (pro hac vice)
800 LaSalle Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
T: [phone]
F: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

/s/ Cari Passmore (by permission)
Cari Passmore
18261 W. Tecoma Road
Goodyear, Arizona 85338
T: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Pro-Se Defendant

David Martinez (Cal. Bar # 193183)
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, California 90067-3208
T: [phone]
F: [phone]
[e-mail]

23
24

Counsel for Plaintiff

25
26
27
28
3

_