Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Filing
38
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order 37 . (see document for details) (hr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Julie L. Hussey, Bar No. 237711
JHussey@perkinscoie.com
Julian Feldbein-Vinderman, Bar No. 307838
JFeldbeinVinderman@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
11452 El Camino Real, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130-2594
Telephone: 858.720.5700
Facsimile: 858.720.5799
Attorneys for Defendant
Amazon.com, Inc.
Christopher Brennan, SBN 220072
Matthew E. Delinko, SBN 302832
BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL,
PLLC
8765 E. Bell Road, Ste. 210
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
Telephone: (480) 502-4664, Ext. 4217
Fax: (480) 502-4774
Attorneys for Plaintiff Hartford
Underwriters Insurance Company
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
foreign corporation, individually and
as subrogee for its insured, Josephine
& Ignazio Vivirito
Plaintiff,
20
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
THEREON1
Magistrate Judge: Hon. Rozella A. Oliver
v.
21
22
Case No. 2:19-cv-07480 AB (RAOx)
TERA-POWER ENERGY
COMPANY, a foreign entity;
GOOD TIME CO., a foreign entity;
HONG KONG UNI-SUN
TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, a
foreign entity; AMAZON.COM,
INC., a Delaware corporation; and
DOES 1 – 20, inclusive,
27
1
28
This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model
protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver’s Procedures.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
1
Defendants.
2
3
4
5
1.
A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential,
6
proprietary or private information for which special protection from public
7
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may
8
be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court
9
to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that
10
this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to
11
discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends
12
only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment
13
under the applicable legal principles.
14
B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT
15
This action is likely to involve confidential and proprietary materials and
16
information including, confidential or competitively sensitive business or
17
financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or
18
other confidential research, development, or commercial information (including
19
information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise
20
generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise
21
protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case
22
decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to
23
facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery
24
materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep
25
confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of
26
such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their
27
handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective
28
order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties
-1STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that
2
nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in
3
a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be
4
part of the public record of this case.
5
C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL
6
The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that
7
this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential
8
information under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must
9
be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission
10
from the court to file material under seal.
11
There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to
12
judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive
13
motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana
14
v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v.
15
Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v.
16
Sony Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated
17
protective orders require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good
18
cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal
19
justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to
20
file under seal. The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material
21
as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence
22
by declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal
23
qualifies as confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good
24
cause.
25
Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial,
26
then compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and
27
the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be
28
protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir.
-2STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed
2
or introduced under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party
3
seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts
4
and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence
5
supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by
6
declaration.
Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable
7
8
in its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be
9
redacted. If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public
10
viewing, omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable
11
portions of the document, shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file
12
documents under seal in their entirety should include an explanation of why
13
redaction is not feasible.
14
2.
15
DEFINITIONS
2.1
Action: This pending federal lawsuit entitled Hartford Underwriters
16
Insurance Company v. Tera-Power Energy Company et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-
17
07480 AB (RAOx).
18
19
20
2.2
Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the
designation of information or items under this Order.
2.3
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of
21
how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for
22
protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in
23
the Good Cause Statement.
24
25
26
2.4
Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as
each of their support staff).
2.5
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or
27
items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as
28
“CONFIDENTIAL.”
-3STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
2.6
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless
2
of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including,
3
among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced
4
or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
5
2.7
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter
6
pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as
7
an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.
8
9
10
11
12
13
2.8
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action.
House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside
counsel.
2.9
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or
other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a
14
party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and
15
have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm
16
that has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff.
17
2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,
18
employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their
19
support staffs).
20
21
2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or
Discovery Material in this Action.
22
2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation
23
support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or
24
demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)
25
and their employees and subcontractors.
26
2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is
27
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “FOR ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
28
-4STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery
1
2
Material from a Producing Party.
2.16 Attorneys’ Eyes Only. The label “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall be
3
4
used in the manner proscribed in subparagraph 5.4 below and means that the only
5
person(s) allowed to view information so labeled are counsel for the Receiving
6
Party which requests the information, or an expert or consultant of the Receiving
7
Party.
8
3.
SCOPE
9
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only
10
Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or
11
extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or
12
compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or
13
presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the
14
15
trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.
16
4.
HANDLING DURING TRIAL
17
Confidential Information that is subject to this Protective Order may be marked
18
and used as trial exhibits by any party, subject to terms and conditions imposed by
19
the Court.
20
5.
21
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.
22
Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under
23
this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that
24
qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for
25
protection only those parts of material, documents, items or oral or written
26
communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents,
27
items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept
28
unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
-5STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it
2
designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must
3
promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation.
4
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in
5
this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material
6
that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before
7
the material is disclosed or produced.
8
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
9
(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic
10
documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial
11
proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the following legend
CONFIDENTIAL: Subject to Protective Order in Case No.
12
2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
13
14
(hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that contains Protected
15
Material. If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the
16
Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making
17
appropriate markings in the margins).
18
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection
19
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated
20
which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and
21
before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be
22
deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents
23
it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents,
24
or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing
25
the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL
26
legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion of the material
27
28
-6STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the
2
protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
(b) Within 30 days after receiving a deposition transcript, a party may
3
4
inform the other Parties if portions of it are designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” All
5
persons and Parties in possession of a copy of a designated deposition transcript
6
shall appropriately mark it as containing protected testimony.
(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and
7
8
for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on
9
the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the
10
legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information
11
warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the
12
protected portion(s).
(d) If a document containing Protected Material is produced in native
13
14
format, the file name shall contain the term “CONFIDENTIAL” or otherwise
15
clearly indicate that it contains information subject to this Protective Order.
16
5.3
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent
17
failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive
18
the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such
19
material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make
20
reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the
21
provisions of this Order.
22
5.4
Highly Sensitive Information. Certain documents to be produced by
23
the Parties may be highly sensitive, proprietary, commercial, or personal
24
information. Such highly sensitive information shall be labeled, in addition to the
25
marking described in subparagraph 5.2, as “FOR ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
26
and such information will be disclosed only to counsel for the requesting party,
27
subject to subparagraph 7.2(a), or to an expert or consultant, subject to
28
subparagraph 7.2(c), and not to the Parties or any other person. A party producing
-7STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
documents that it believes constitute highly sensitive information shall label the
2
documents with the following legend or something substantially similar:
3
CONFIDENTIAL - FOR ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY: Subject to
4
Protective Order in Case No. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
5
Documents labeled “FOR ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” are subject to all of
6
the provisions of this Protective Order governing the use, disclosure, and
7
destruction of Protected Material, as well as the additional restrictions contained in
8
this subparagraph 5.4.
9
6.
10
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a
11
designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s
12
Scheduling Order.
13
14
6.2
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute
resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq.
15
6.3
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on
16
the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose
17
(e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may
18
expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived
19
or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall continue to afford the
20
material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing
21
Party’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge.
22
7.
23
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is
24
disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this
25
Action only for prosecuting, defending or attempting to settle this Action. Such
26
Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the
27
conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a
28
-8STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL
2
DISPOSITION).
3
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a
4
location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons
5
authorized under this Order.
6
7.2
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless
7
otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a
8
Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated
9
“CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as
10
11
well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably
12
necessary to disclose the information for this Action;
(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of
13
14
the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;
(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom
15
16
disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the
17
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
18
(d) the court and its personnel;
19
(e) court reporters and their staff;
20
(f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional
21
Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have
22
signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
23
24
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;
(h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the
25
26
Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party
27
requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto; and (2) they
28
will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign the
-9STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise
2
agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed
3
deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may
4
be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone
5
except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and
(i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel,
6
7
mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions.
8
8.
9
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED
IN OTHER LITIGATION
10
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation
11
that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as
12
“CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must:
(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification
13
14
shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order
15
16
to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the
17
subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include
18
a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and
19
(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be
20
pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
21
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with
22
the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this
23
action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the
24
subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s
25
permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking
26
protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions
27
should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action
28
to disobey a lawful directive from another court.
-10STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
2
9.
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE
PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION
(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a
3
4
Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information
5
produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the
6
remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be
7
construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to
8
9
produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is
10
subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s
11
confidential information, then the Party shall:
(1)
12
promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-
13
Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality
14
agreement with a Non-Party;
15
(2)
promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated
16
Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably
17
specific description of the information requested; and
(3)
18
19
make the information requested available for inspection by the
Non-Party, if requested.
(c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within
20
21
14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party
22
may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery
23
request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall
24
not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the
25
confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court.
26
Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and
27
expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.
28
-11STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
10.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
2
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
3
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this
4
Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in
5
writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts
6
to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or
7
persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order,
8
and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and
9
Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
10
11.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED MATERIAL
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain
11
12
13
inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other
14
protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal
15
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify
16
whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for
17
production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence
18
502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure
19
of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work
20
21
22
23
24
product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated
protective order submitted to the court.
12.
MISCELLANEOUS
12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any
person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.
25
12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this
26
Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to
27
disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in
28
this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on
-12STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective
2
Order.
3
12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
4
Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected Material
5
may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
6
specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material
7
under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information
8
in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court.
9
13.
FINAL DISPOSITION
10
Within 90 days after the final disposition of this Action, as defined in
11
paragraph 4, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing
12
Party or destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material”
13
includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format
14
reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected
15
Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written
16
certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the
17
Designating Party) by the 90 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where
18
appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms
19
that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations,
20
summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected
21
Material.
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
-13STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
2
3
14.
VIOLATION
Any violation of this Order may be punished by appropriate measures
including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions.
4
5
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD
DATED: May 19, 2020
PERKINS COIE LLP
7
By:/s/ Julian Feldbein-Vinderman
Julie L. Hussey, Bar No. 237711
JHussey@perkinscoie.com
Julian Feldbein-Vinderman, Bar No. 307838
JFeldbeinVinderman@perkinscoie.com
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant
Amazon.com, Inc.
11
12
DATED: May 19, 2020
13
14
BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL,
PLLC
By:/s/ Matthew E. Delinko
Matthew E. Delinko
mdelinko@blwmlawfirm.com
Christopher J. Brennan
cbrennan@blwmlawfirm.com
15
16
17
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
18
19
20
21
22
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: May 20, 2020
23
24
______________________________
Honorable Rozella A. Oliver
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
-14STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
3510019v1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of
_________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury
that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that
was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California
in the case of Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v. Tera-Power Energy
Company, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-07480-AB (RAO). I agree to comply with and to
be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and
acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment
in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner
any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any
person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court
for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this
Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after
termination of this action.
I hereby appoint _____________________[print or type full name] of
____________________________________[print or type full address and telephone
number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action
or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.
22
23
24
Date: ________________
City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________
25
26
27
Printed name: _______________________________
Signature: __________________________________
28
-1STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07480 AB(RAOx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?