Belinda C. Muhammad v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
Filing
148
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt 145 . The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accord ingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Amended Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to FRCP 37(e) for Spoliation of Video Evidence is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve copies of this Order on Plaintiff at her current address of record and on counsel for Defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BELINDA C. MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
BRETANNIYIA JENKINS,
Case No. CV 19-7970 JAK (PVC)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendant.
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Amended Motion
18
for Sanctions Pursuant to FRCP 37(e) for Spoliation of Video Evidence, all the records
19
and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
20
Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and
21
no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the
22
findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Amended Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to
FRCP 37(e) for Spoliation of Video Evidence is DENIED.
1
2
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve copies of this Order on Plaintiff at her
current address of record and on counsel for Defendant.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
DATED: September 15, 2022
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?