Robert C. Woods v. Marion E. Spearman
Filing
22
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20). Plaintiff indicated that he does not object to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 21.) The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition on the merits. #20 (es)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT C. WOODS,
12
Petitioner,
13
Case No. 2:19-cv-10804-JAK-KES
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
v.
14
MARION E. SPEARMAN, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the
19
other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the U.S.
20
Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20). Plaintiff indicated that he does not object to the Report
21
and Recommendation. (Dkt. 21.) The Court accepts the report, findings, and
22
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the
Petition on the merits.
September 11, 2020
DATED: ___________________
____________________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?