Robert C. Woods v. Marion E. Spearman

Filing 22

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendatio n of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20). Plaintiff indicated that he does not object to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 21.) The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition on the merits. 20 (es)

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT C. WOODS, 12 Petitioner, 13 Case No. 2:19-cv-10804-JAK-KES ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. 14 MARION E. SPEARMAN, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the 19 other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. 20 Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20). Plaintiff indicated that he does not object to the Report 21 and Recommendation. (Dkt. 21.) The Court accepts the report, findings, and 22 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition on the merits. September 11, 2020 DATED: ___________________ ____________________________________ JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?