Lydia Olson et al v. State of California et al

Filing 93

JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: This Court having granted Defendant Rob Bonta's Motion to Dismiss 92 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., and Uber Technologies, Inc., whose action is dismissed with prejudice on the merits. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LYDIA OLSON; MIGUEL PEREZ;

12

POSTMATES, INC.; and UBER

13

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

v.
ROB BONTA, in his capacity as
Attorney General of the State of
California and personal capacity,
Defendant.

)
) Case No. CV 19-10956-DMG (RAOx)
)
)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1-

1
2

This Court having granted Defendant Rob Bonta’s Motion to Dismiss by Order dated
July 16, 2021,

3

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor

4

of Defendant and against Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., and Uber

5

Technologies, Inc., whose action is dismissed with prejudice on the merits.

6
7

DATED: July 16, 2021

8

DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-