Laurie Mateyko v. County of Santa Barbara, et al
Filing
41
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation to Dismiss between Plaintiff Laurie Mateyko and Defendants County of Santa Barbara, Sergeant Sandy Frausto, Deputy Justin Oropeza, Deputy Joseph Parker and Deputy Patrick Hayes 40 is APPROVED and the action and all parties are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own costs, expenses, and fees. (gk)
Case 2:20-cv-01257-DMG-KS Document 41 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:710
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
LAURIE MATEYKO,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: CV 20-1257-DMG (KSx)
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE [40]
vs.
12
13
14
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
The Court, having reviewed and approved the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with
18
Prejudice by and between Plaintiff Laurie Mateyko and Defendants County Of Santa
19
Barbara, Sergeant Sandy Frausto, Deputy Justin Oropeza, Deputy Joseph Parker and
20
Deputy Patrick Hayes, and good cause appearing,
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation to Dismiss between Plaintiff
22
Laurie Mateyko and Defendants County of Santa Barbara, Sergeant Sandy Frausto,
23
Deputy Justin Oropeza, Deputy Joseph Parker and Deputy Patrick Hayes is APPROVED
24
and the above-captioned action and all parties are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and
25
Defendants shall bear their own costs, expenses, and fees.
26
27
28
DATED: September 7, 2021
________________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?