Laurie Mateyko v. County of Santa Barbara, et al

Filing 41

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation to Dismiss between Plaintiff Laurie Mateyko and Defendants County of Santa Barbara, Sergeant Sandy Frausto, Deputy Justin Oropeza, Deputy Joseph Parker and Deputy Patrick Hayes 40 is APPROVED and the action and all parties are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own costs, expenses, and fees. (gk)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-01257-DMG-KS Document 41 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:710 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 LAURIE MATEYKO, Plaintiff, Case No.: CV 20-1257-DMG (KSx) ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [40] vs. 12 13 14 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 The Court, having reviewed and approved the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with 18 Prejudice by and between Plaintiff Laurie Mateyko and Defendants County Of Santa 19 Barbara, Sergeant Sandy Frausto, Deputy Justin Oropeza, Deputy Joseph Parker and 20 Deputy Patrick Hayes, and good cause appearing, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation to Dismiss between Plaintiff 22 Laurie Mateyko and Defendants County of Santa Barbara, Sergeant Sandy Frausto, 23 Deputy Justin Oropeza, Deputy Joseph Parker and Deputy Patrick Hayes is APPROVED 24 and the above-captioned action and all parties are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and 25 Defendants shall bear their own costs, expenses, and fees. 26 27 28 DATED: September 7, 2021 ________________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?