Michael Jame Addineh v. Fariba Kermanshahi et al

Filing 32

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin for MOTION to Dismiss 7 , MOTION to Consolidate Cases, as to 2:20-cv-07303-FMO-RAO 30 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate, Dkt. No. 30, is DENIED AS MOOT. (see document for further details) (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JAME ADDINEH, Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 Case No. CV 20-01500 FMO (RAO) FARIBA KERMANSHAHI, et al., Defendants. 15 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint, 18 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 19 (“Report”), and all other records and files herein. Further, the Court has made a de 20 novo determination of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. 21 The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiff’s objections. The Court hereby accepts and 22 adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED 2 without prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate, 3 Dkt. No. 30, is DENIED AS MOOT. 4 5 6 DATED: October 13, 2020 ___________/s/______________________ FERNANDO M. OLGUIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?