Michael Jame Addineh v. Fariba Kermanshahi et al

Filing 32

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin for MOTION to Dismiss #7 , MOTION to Consolidate Cases, as to 2:20-cv-07303-FMO-RAO #30 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate, Dkt. No. 30, is DENIED AS MOOT. (see document for further details) (hr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL JAME ADDINEH,
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

Case No. CV 20-01500 FMO (RAO)

FARIBA KERMANSHAHI, et al.,
Defendants.

15

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE AND DENYING MOTION
TO CONSOLIDATE

16
17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint,

18

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

19

(“Report”), and all other records and files herein. Further, the Court has made a de

20

novo determination of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected.

21

The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiff’s objections. The Court hereby accepts and

22

adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED

2

without prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate,

3

Dkt. No. 30, is DENIED AS MOOT.

4
5
6

DATED: October 13, 2020

___________/s/______________________
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2