Edward Leon Guy III v. Ben Carson et al

Filing 16

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson for Report and Recommendation 13 . (1) The R&R is ACCEPTED; (2) The following claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: (a) Plaintiff's claims against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Veteran's Administration; (b) Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment and Cal. Civ. Code § 827 claim against the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles ("HACLA"); and (c) Pl aintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("§ 1983") claim against DROB LLC. (3) The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims against Defendant DROB LLC, and DISMISSES DROB LLC from this ac tion, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claim brought under § 1983 against Defendants HACLA, Sylvia Kaplan, and Cindy Salazar may proceed, and the Court will issue a separate order regarding service of this remaining claim on these three defendants. (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3  4  5 6  7 8 UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT 9 CENTRALDISTRICTOFCALIFORNIA 10  11 EDWARDLEONGUY,III, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDERACCEPTINGFINDINGSAND RECOMMENDATIONOFUNITEDSTATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE v. 14  BENCARSON,etal.,    15 16 CaseNo.2:20ͲcvͲ01581ͲDDP(SHK)  Defendants. 17  18  19 AmendedComplaint(“SAC”)andtheReportandRecommendation(“R&R”)ofthe 20 UnitedStatesMagistrateJudge,issuedonJune22,2020.ElectronicCaseFiling 21 Number(“ECFNo.”)13,R&R.TheCourthasengagedindenovoreviewofthose 22 portionsoftheReporttowhichPlaintiffhasobjected.TheCourtacceptsthe 23 findingsandrecommendationoftheMagistrateJudge. 24  Pursuantto28U.S.C.§636,theCourthasreviewedPlaintiff’sSecond ITISTHEREFOREORDEREDthat: 25 (1) TheR&RisACCEPTED; 26 (2) ThefollowingclaimsareDISMISSEDWITHOUTPREJUDICE: 27 28 1 (a) Plaintiff’sclaimsagainsttheUnitedStatesDepartmentof 2 HousingandUrbanDevelopmentandtheVeteran’s 3 Administration; 4 (b) Plaintiff’sFifthAmendmentandCal.Civ.Code§827claim 5 againsttheHousingAuthorityoftheCityofLosAngeles 6 (“HACLA”);and 7 8 (c) (3) Plaintiff’s42U.S.C.§1983(“§1983”)claimagainstDROBLLC. TheCourtDECLINEStoexercisesupplementaljurisdictionoverthe 9 remainingstatelawclaimsagainstDefendantDROBLLC,and 10 DISMISSESDROBLLCfromthisaction,WITHOUTPREJUDICE. 11 ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatPlaintiff’sFourteenthAmendmentdue 12 processclaimbroughtunder§1983againstDefendantsHACLA,SylviaKaplan,and 13 CindySalazarmayproceed,andtheCourtwillissueaseparateorderregarding 14 serviceofthisremainingclaimonthesethreedefendants. 15   Dated:May23,2023    16 17 18        HONORABLEDEAND.PREGERSON UnitedStatesDistrictJudge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?