Sandra Parness v. Target Corporation et al
Filing
28
ORDER ON STIPULATION 27 TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This action and all claims herein are dismissed with prejudice, and the parties will bear their own respective attorneys' fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
1
2
3
4
JS-6
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
SANDRA PARNESS,
CASE NO.: 2:20-cv-02229-FMO-PJW
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER ON STIPULATION [27] TO
DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
14
15
TARGET CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Action Filed: March 6, 2020
State Complaint Filed: November 25,
2019
Pretrial Conference: November 19, 2021,
10:00 a.m.
Trial: December 7, 2021, 9:00 a.m.
18
19
On April 23, 2021, the parties jointly submitted a Stipulation of Dismissal,
20 dismissing this entire action and claims herein, with prejudice, to the Court.
21 Accordingly, this action and all claims herein are dismissed with prejudice, and the
22 parties will bear their own respective attorneys’ fees and costs.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25 Dated: April 26, 2021
26
/s/ Fernando M. Olguin
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
Sandra Parness, v. Target Corporation, et al.
United States District Court - Central District of California
Court Case No.: 2:20-cv-0229-FMO-PJW
Client/Matter: 146500
3
4
5
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to the action.
6 My business address is 500 N. Brand Boulevard, Suite 1650, Glendale, California
7 91203.
8
On April 26, 2021, I served the following document described as
9 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL on the following
10 persons at the following address:
11
SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
12
BY MAIL: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and
13
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be
deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon
14
fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I
am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
15
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date
of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
16
BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I served such envelope or package to be
17
delivered on the same day to an authorized courier or driver authorized by the
overnight service carrier to receive documents, in an envelope or package
18
designated by the overnight service carrier.
19
20
21
BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: I caused the above-entitled document(s) to
be served via E-mail to the E-mail addresses on the attached Service List.
23
FEDERAL: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar
of this Court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty
of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is
true and correct.
24
Executed on April 26, 2021, at Glendale, California.
22
25
26
27
/s/ Liseth Gonzalez
LISETH GONZALEZ
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
1
SERVICE LIST
2
Sandra Parness v. Target Corporation, et al.
United States District Court
Central District of California, Court Case No.: 2:20-cv-0229-FMO-PJW
Client/Matter: 146500
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Michael A. Greene, Esq.
Jeffrey A. Kaiman, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF KAIMAN,
GREENE & ASSOCIATES
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, California 90067
Tel: (310) 789-2030
Fax: (310) 789-2031
E: mag@kaimanlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDRA
PARNESS
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?