Wendy Magee v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al
Filing
35
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant Nike Retail Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 23 34 , IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action, Wendy Magee v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al., 2:20-cv-02618-VAP-GJSx, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
1
2
JS-6
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
Wendy Magee,
Plaintiff,
9
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
v.
10
2:20‐cv‐02618‐VAP‐GJSx
Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
11
JUDGMENT
12
13
14
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
15
Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant Nike Retail Services, Inc.’s
16
Motion for Summary Judgment, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the
17
action, Wendy Magee v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al., 2:20-cv-02618-
18
VAP-GJSx, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such
19
judgment be entered.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
6/2/21
Virginia A. Phillips
United States District Judge
24
25
26
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?