Wendy Magee v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al

Filing 35

JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant Nike Retail Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 23 34 , IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action, Wendy Magee v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al., 2:20-cv-02618-VAP-GJSx, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

Download PDF
  1 2 JS-6     3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 Wendy Magee, Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court Central District of California 8 v. 10 2:20‐cv‐02618‐VAP‐GJSx  Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. 11 JUDGMENT 12 13 14 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 15 Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant Nike Retail Services, Inc.’s 16 Motion for Summary Judgment, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the 17 action, Wendy Magee v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., et al., 2:20-cv-02618- 18 VAP-GJSx, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such 19 judgment be entered. 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/2/21 Virginia A. Phillips United States District Judge 24 25 26 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?