Jane Doe, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al

Filing 65

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting in Part Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing State Law Claims 64 , it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. The Court DISMISSE S WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs' First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Eighth claims for relief, which were all alleged pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. 2. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over, and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Plain tiffs' Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth claims for relief. 3. Defendants shall have JUDGMENT in their favor on Plaintiffs' First,Second, Third, Fourth, and Eighth claims for relief. 4. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

O
JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

United States District Court
Central District of California

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case № 2:20-cv-02748-ODW (PVCx)

JANE DOE et al.,
Plaintiffs,

FINAL JUDGMENT

v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al.,
Defendants.

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment and Dismissing State Law Claims, it is therefore ORDERED,
ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1

1.

The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs’ First, Second,

2

Third, Fourth, and Eighth claims for relief, which were all alleged

3

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

4

2.

The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over, and

5

DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Plaintiffs’ Fifth, Sixth,

6

Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth claims for relief.

7

3.

Second, Third, Fourth, and Eighth claims for relief.

8
9

Defendants shall have JUDGMENT in their favor on Plaintiffs’ First,

4.

The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

January 17, 2023

14
15
16
17

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2