Edgardo Carrillo v. Shewak and Lajwanti Holdings, LLC et al

Filing 33

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge John F. Walter: As a result of Plaintiffs failure to prosecute this action and Plaintiffs violation of the CourtsOrder, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Pretrial Conference scheduled for June 18, 2021 andthe trial scheduled for June 29, 2021 are hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 20-6873-JFW(MRWx) Title: Edgardo Carrillo -v- Shewak and Lajwanti Holdings, LLC et al Date: June 4, 2021 PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly Courtroom Deputy None Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None ORDER DISMISSING ACTION On July 31, 2020, Plaintiff Edgardo Carrillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendants Shewak & Lajwanti Holdings LLC1 (“Shewak”) and Apex Cabinet Depot Inc. (“Apex”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Docket No. 1. On September 8, 2020, the Clerk entered default against Apex. Docket No. 12. On February 26, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Apex. Docket No. 27. On March 16, 2021, based on Plaintiff’s Response, the Court continued the OSC to April 30, 2021. See Docket Nos. 29 and 30. On April 30, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Declaration of Faythe Gutierrez In Response to the February 26, 2021 OSC (Continued to April 30, 2021) (“Gutierrez Declaration”). Docket No. 32. In her Declaration, Gutierrez requested that the Court “permit Plaintiff five (5) additional days [to] file their motion for default judgement against” Apex. Gutierrez Declaration, ¶ 7. In its OSC, the Court expressly warned that “[f]ailure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action.” However, despite the fact that it has been thirtyfive days since Gutierrez filed her declaration stating that Plaintiff would file a motion for default judgment within five days, Plaintiff has failed to file a motion for default judgment against Apex. In addition, Plaintiff failed to file any Pretrial Documents – or any other document informing the Court as to the status of this case – on or before June 1, 2021, as required by the Court’s Scheduling and Case Management Order. As a result of Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and Plaintiff’s violation of the Court’s Order, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); 1 On September 22, 2020, Shewak filed an Answer to the Complaint, and on March 24, 2021, Shewak was dismissed from this action pursuant to a Stipulation between Plaintiff and Shewak. See Docket Nos. 19, 26, and 31. Page 1 of 2 Initials of Deputy Clerk sr see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-988 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). The Pretrial Conference scheduled for June 18, 2021 and the trial scheduled for June 29, 2021 are hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 2 of 2 Initials of Deputy Clerk sr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?