Lymbhya Tavera Garcia v. Target Brands, Inc., et al
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff Lymbhya T. Garcia's Motion to Remand 10 is GRANTED for failure to oppose. The Court hereby REMANDS this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV15673. The 9/18/2020 hearing and all other hearing dates and deadlines are VACATED. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated. ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CV 20-7257-DMG (PVCx)
Title Lymbhya T. Garcia v. Target Brands, Inc., et al.
Present: The Honorable
JS-6 / REMAND
September 14, 2020
1 of 1
DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s)
Attorneys Present for Defendant(s)
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS— ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
On August 20, 2020, Plaintiff Lymbhya T. Garcia filed a motion to remand (“MTR”) this
action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, [Doc. # 14] after Defendant Target Corporation
removed the action to this Court on August 12, 2020, [Doc. # 1]. The matter is currently set for
hearing on September 18, 2020. See MTR. Plaintiff’s opposition was due no later than August
28, 2020. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9 (opposition papers due at least 21 days before the date of the
motion hearing). No opposition has been filed, and the time to do so has now passed.
The MTR is therefore GRANTED for failure to oppose. See Oakley, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.,
988 F. Supp. 2d 1130, 1139 (C.D. Cal. 2013) (citing L.R. 7-12) (“[T]he Local Rules permit the
Court [to] deem failure to oppose as consent to the granting of the motion.”). The Court hereby
REMANDS this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. The September 18, 2020
hearing and all other hearing dates and deadlines are VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Deputy Clerk KT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?