James Hampton v. Robert W. Fox et al

Filing 5

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Court previously received from Plaintiff, a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request or payment of the filing fees. The Court sent a warning letter to Plaintiff advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
James Hampton,

CASE NUMBER

2:20-CV-07562-DDP(SP)
v.

Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s),

Robert W. Fox, et al.,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND
Defendant(s)/Respondent(s).

The Court previously received from

Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s)

Defendant(s)/Respondent(s):

an IFP Request with no accompanying Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal.
a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request
or payment of the filing fees.
a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal with a partial filing fee payment for an amount
less than the required $400.
The Court sent a warning letter to
Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s)
Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) advising that
failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in
dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been
corrected.
Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED
DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number.
REMANDED to the
accepted under this case number.

. No further findings shall be

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

October 15, 2020
United States District Judge

IFP-10 (05/18)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND

Page 1 of 1