Luis Villegas v. Walmart Inc. et al
Filing
19
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: On 1/8/2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution 18 . A written re sponse to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than 1/13/2021. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Luis Villegas
Case No. CV 20-07677-AB (GJSx)
11
12
13
14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
v.
Walmart Inc. et al
15
16
(PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41)
Defendants.
17
18
On January 8, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case
19
should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to
20
Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than January 13, 2021. No response having
21
been filed to the Court’s Order to Show Cause,
22
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed,
23
without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of
24
the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41.
25
26
27
Dated: January 15, 2021
_______________________________________
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
1.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?