L. C. Cunningham v. C. Fpieffer
Filing
9
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter, Related to: Order Summarily Dismissing Petition #8 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: (1) Grounds Two, Four, Five, Seven, Eight, Nine, and Ten, in their entirety, and Grounds One and Six, to the extent they relate to the 2017 parole decision, of the Petition ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (see document for further details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
L. C. CUNNINGHAM,
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
15
C. PFIEFFER, Warden,
16
Respondent.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:20-cv-07903-JFW (JDE)
JUDGMENT
19
Pursuant to the Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of
20
Habeas Corpus and Referring a Portion Thereof to the Ninth Circuit Court of
21
Appeals Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(A),
22
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
23
(1)
24
entirety, and Grounds One and Six, to the extent they relate to the
25
2017 parole decision, of the Petition ARE DISMISSED WITH
26
27
28
Grounds Two, Four, Five, Seven, Eight, Nine, and Ten, in their
PREJUDICE; and
///
1
(2)
Ground Three, in its entirety, and Grounds One and Six, to the
2
extent they relate to Petitioner’s 1986 conviction, of the Petition
3
are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in this Court.
4
5
6
Dated: October 15, 2020
______________________________
JOHN F. WALTER
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?