L. C. Cunningham v. C. Fpieffer

Filing 9

JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter, Related to: Order Summarily Dismissing Petition 8 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: (1) Grounds Two, Four, Five, Seven, Eight, Nine, and Ten, in their entirety, and Grounds One and Six, to the extent they relate to the 2017 parole decision, of the Petition ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (see document for further details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 L. C. CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, 13 v. 14 15 C. PFIEFFER, Warden, 16 Respondent. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:20-cv-07903-JFW (JDE) JUDGMENT 19 Pursuant to the Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of 20 Habeas Corpus and Referring a Portion Thereof to the Ninth Circuit Court of 21 Appeals Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(A), 22 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 23 (1) 24 entirety, and Grounds One and Six, to the extent they relate to the 25 2017 parole decision, of the Petition ARE DISMISSED WITH 26 27 28 Grounds Two, Four, Five, Seven, Eight, Nine, and Ten, in their PREJUDICE; and /// 1 (2) Ground Three, in its entirety, and Grounds One and Six, to the 2 extent they relate to Petitioner’s 1986 conviction, of the Petition 3 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in this Court. 4 5 6 Dated: October 15, 2020 ______________________________ JOHN F. WALTER United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?