Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Jessica London, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 63 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall each bear its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with this Action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JESSICA LONDON, INC., an Indiana ) ) Corporation; FULLBEAUTY ) BRANDS, OPERATIONS, LLC, an ) Indiana Limited Liability Company; ) FULLBEAUTY BRANDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-10, ) ) inclusive, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Case No: CV 20-8624-GW-JCx ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Hon. George H. Wu Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Dismissal with Prejudice filed by 2 Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Jessica London, 3 Inc., FullBeauty Brands Operations, LLC, and FullBeauty Brands, Inc. (collectively, 4 “Defendants”) and having found good cause to exist, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above captioned 6 action is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall each bear its own attorneys’ fees 7 and costs incurred in connection with this Action. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: January 10, 2022 Honorable George H. Wu United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?