William Martin et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al

Filing 143

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Final Approval of Nationwide Class Action Settlement and Plaintiffs' Motion forAttorneys Fees and Costs and Incentive Award, all claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. (et)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-10518-JVS-MRW Document 143 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:4950 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 JASON M. FRANK (190957) ANDREW D. STOLPER (205462) SCOTT H. SIMS (234148) FRANK SIMS & STOLPER LLP 19800 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 855 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 201-2400 Facsimile: (949) 201-2405 FRANKLIN D. AZAR (pro hac vice) FRANKLIN D. AZAR & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 14426 East Evans Avenue Aurora, CO 80014 Telephone: (303) 757-3300 Facsimile: (720) 213-5131 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, the Proposed Class and Subclasses 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 Case No.: 2:20-cv-10518-JVS-MRW WILLIAM MARTIN and LORI 20 MITCHELL, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JUDGMENT 21 Plaintiffs, 22 23 vs. 24 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, a California 26 Corporation 25 27 Defendant. 28 1 JUDGMENT Case 2:20-cv-10518-JVS-MRW Document 143 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:4951 1 For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for 2 Final Approval of Nationwide Class Action Settlement and Plaintiffs’ Motion for 3 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and Incentive Award, all claims against Defendants are 4 dismissed with prejudice. 5 6 The Clerk is directed to enter this Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED 9 10 11 12 DATED: November 16, 2022 ____________________________________ Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?