Hawthorne Hangar Operations, L.P. et al v. Hawthorne Airport, LLC et al
Filing
60
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Compel Arbitration, Order on Motion to Strike, #59 ; it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs Hawthorne Hangar Operations, L.P. and Dan Wolfe ("Plaintiffs"); and 2. Plaintiffs take nothing and Defendants are entitled to their costs of suit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
HAWTHORNE HANGAR
OPERATIONS, L.P., et al.
JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
Case No. CV 20-10744 PA (ASx)
v.
HAWTHORNE AIRPORT, LLC, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Pursuant to the Court’s March 12, 2021 Order granting defendant the City of
19
Hawthorne’s Motion to Dismiss and the Court’s April 27, 2021 Order granting defendants
20
Hawthorne Airport LLC, Advanced Air LLC, David Wehrly, and Levi Stockton’s (together
21
with the City of Hawthorne, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment, it is HEREBY
22
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
23
24
25
1.
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs Hawthorne
Hangar Operations, L.P. and Dan Wolfe (“Plaintiffs”); and
2.
Plaintiffs take nothing and Defendants are entitled to their costs of suit
26
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54.
27
DATED: April 27, 2021
28
___________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?