Hawthorne Hangar Operations, L.P. et al v. Hawthorne Airport, LLC et al

Filing 60

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Compel Arbitration, Order on Motion to Strike, 59 ; it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and ag ainst Plaintiffs Hawthorne Hangar Operations, L.P. and Dan Wolfe ("Plaintiffs"); and 2. Plaintiffs take nothing and Defendants are entitled to their costs of suit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 HAWTHORNE HANGAR OPERATIONS, L.P., et al. JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 Case No. CV 20-10744 PA (ASx) v. HAWTHORNE AIRPORT, LLC, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to the Court’s March 12, 2021 Order granting defendant the City of 19 Hawthorne’s Motion to Dismiss and the Court’s April 27, 2021 Order granting defendants 20 Hawthorne Airport LLC, Advanced Air LLC, David Wehrly, and Levi Stockton’s (together 21 with the City of Hawthorne, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment, it is HEREBY 22 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 23 24 25 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs Hawthorne Hangar Operations, L.P. and Dan Wolfe (“Plaintiffs”); and 2. Plaintiffs take nothing and Defendants are entitled to their costs of suit 26 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. 27 DATED: April 27, 2021 28 ___________________________________ Percy Anderson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?