Michael Nieman v. Valley Gym Corp., et al

Filing 22

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff's individual claims and without prejudice as to the class claims. Upon good cause shown within 45 days from the filing date of this Order, plaintiff may seek to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL NIEMAN,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

v.
VALLEY GYM CORP.,
Defendant.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 20-11647 FMO (ASx)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

17

The complaint in the above-captioned case contains individual and class allegations.

18

Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Settlement notifying the court that plaintiff has settled his individual

19

claims with defendant. (See Dkt. 21, Amended Notice of Settlement). Having reviewed the case

20

file and determined that no prejudice to the putative class will result from the dismissal, IT IS

21

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff’s

22

individual claims and without prejudice as to the class claims. Upon good cause shown within

23

45 days from the filing date of this Order, plaintiff may seek to re-open the action if settlement

24

is not consummated.

25

Dated this 4th day of June, 2021.

26
27
28

/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge