CPE HR, Inc. v. Total Administrative Services Corporation et al

Filing 24

ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE (DKT. 23 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED, and this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) subject to the terms of the parties' Settlement Agreement. Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 CPE HR, INC., a California
Corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13 v.
14 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICE CORPORATION, a
15 Wisconsin Corporation; and DOES
through 100,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No.: 2:21-cv-00925-JAK-PLA
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION
TO DISMISS CASE (DKT. 23)
JS-6

1

Based on a review of the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Case (the “Stipulation”

2 (Dkt. 23)), sufficient good cause has been shown for certain of the requested relief.
3 Therefore, the Stipulation is APPROVED, and this action is dismissed with
4 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) subject to the
5 terms of the parties’ Settlement Agreement. Each party shall bear its own litigation
6 costs and attorney’s fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the
7 Settlement Agreement.
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

DATED: ____________, 2021
July 15

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge