Mark Raggio v. CBRE, Inc., et al
Filing
54
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 53 . PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Mark Raggio's action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court hereby terminates all proceedings in this action. The Parties shall bear their own costs and fees associated with this action and the dismissal. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
MARK RAGGIO,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
Case No. 2:21−cv−03237 PA (JPRx)
vs.
ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
CBRE, INC.,
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
18
19
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, and Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Mark Raggio’s action is dismissed with
20
prejudice. The Court hereby terminates all proceedings in this action. The Parties
21
shall bear their own costs and fees associated with this action and the dismissal.
22
23
24
Dated: January 7, 2022
25
__________________________________
Percy Anderson
United States District Judge
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
DB1/ 126664307.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?