Henry Canani v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filing
117
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon Stipulation #116 , it is ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff is entitled to recover judgment for a total sum of $38,979.85, inclusive of damages for breach of both the express warranty and the implied warranty; (2) The parties further agree that this Stipulated Judgment entitles Plaintiff to pursue reasonable attorney fees, costs and expenses pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1794(d) and is the prevailing party. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
3
4
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
10
Case No. 2:21-cv-03346-SB-JC
HENRY CANANI,
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND
ORDER
vs.
Trial: December 28, 2021
FORD MOTOR COMPANY; and DOES
1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Judge: Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.
Magistrate: Hon. Jacqueline Chooljian
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER
1
2
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff HENRY CANANI (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant FORD MOTOR
3
COMPANY (“Defendant”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their
4
respective counsel of record, have entered into a stipulation for entry of judgment
5
on Plaintiff’s 1st Cause of Action to the Complaint for Violation of Civil Code
6
1793.2(d) and 5th Cause of Action to the Complaint for Breach of the Implied
7
Warranty of Merchantability (California Civil Code § 1791.1). The Complaint
8
was filed on March 17, 2020.
9
The Parties stipulate to the following Findings and Order:
FINDINGS
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff Henry Canani purchased a 2018 Ford F-150 distributed by
Ford Motor Company.
2.
At the time of purchase, Ford Motor Company was in the business of
distributing 2018 Ford F-150 vehicles.
14
1.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
3.
Ford Motor Company gave Henry Canani a written warranty
covering the 2018 Ford F-150.
4.
The 2018 Ford F-150 had a defect covered by a written warranty and
that substantially impaired its use.
5.
Henry Canani delivered the vehicle to Ford Motor Company or its
authorized repair facility for repair of the defect.
6.
Ford Motor Company or its authorized repair facility failed to repair
22
the vehicle to match the written warranty after a reasonable number of
23
opportunities to do so.
24
7.
Henry Canani’s 2018 Ford F-150 was not of the same quality as those
25
generally accepted in the trade or fit for the ordinary purpose for which it was
26
intended.
27
8.
Plaintiff is entitled to recover $38,979.85 with respect to Plaintiff’s
28
1
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER
1
2
3
4
5th Cause of Action for Breach of the Implied Warranty of Merchantability.
9.
Plaintiff is entitled to recover $37,095.15 with respect to Plaintiff’s
1st Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code Section 1793.2(d).
10.
Plaintiff elects recovery of $38,979.85 for Plaintiff’s 5th Cause of
5
Action for Breach of the Implied Warranty of Merchantability and does not seek
6
to recover $37,095.15 for the Plaintiff’s 1st Cause of Action.
7
11.
This action came for Trial on December 28, 2021 in Department 6C
8
of the United States District Court, Central District of California, the Hon. Stanley
9
Blumenfeld, Jr., presiding. A unanimous jury of eight sworn-in individuals
10
reached a verdict finding that Ford Motor Company did not willfully fail to
11
repurchase or replace the 2018 Ford F-150.
12
THEREFORE, it is ORDERED:
13
1.
Plaintiff is entitled to recover judgment for a total sum of $38,979.85,
inclusive of damages for breach of both the express warranty and the implied
15
warranty.
14
16
2.
The parties further agree that this Stipulated Judgment entitles
17
Plaintiff to pursue reasonable attorney fees, costs and expenses pursuant to
18
California Civil Code § 1794(d) and is the prevailing party.
19
20
21
CONSUMER LAW EXPERTS, PC
Dated: December 29, 2021
SANDERS ROBERT LLP
Dated: January 7, 2022
By: /s/ Benjeman Beck
BENJEMAN BECK
CAREY WOOD
SEAN CRANDALL
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
HENRY CANANI
By: /s/ Sabrina Narain
JUSTIN H. SANDERS, ESQ.
SABRINA NARAIN, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT
4
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF HENRY CANANI
5
AND AGAINST FORD MOTOR COMPANY.
6
7
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOF OF PLAINITFF AS FOLLOWS:
8
9
10
1.
Total payment of $38,979.85 on Plaintiff’s election of remedy for the
breach of the implied warranty and not breach of the express warranty.
11
2.
Attorney fees, costs and expenses are to be resolved informally.
12
3.
If the parties are unable to informally resolve the attorney fees, costs
and expenses by motion then Plaintiff shall file a motion for attorney fees, costs
14
and expenses by January 10, 2022.
13
15
4.
Defendant is to file any opposition by January 14, 2022.
16
5.
Plaintiff may file a reply by January 17, 2022.
17
18
SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated: January 7, 2022
22
23
24
Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?