Jonathan Flores v. United States of America, et al

Filing 92

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Jonathan Flores shall take nothing from Defendant United States of America on his Complaint, and that Judgment is h ereby entered in favor of Defendant United States of America and against Plaintiff Jonathan Flores. Defendant United States of America shall file any motion or application for costs within fourteen (14) days of the date this Order was filed. Any motion or application for costs must comply with Local Rule 54-2. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JONATHAN FLORES, an individual Case No. 2:21-cv-03608-FWS-MAA Plaintiff, JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Honorable Fred W. Slaughter United States District Judge On March 28, March 29, and March 31, 2023, the court held a bench trial on this 1 2 matter in Courtroom 10D of the United States District Court, Central District of 3 California, the Honorable Fred W. Slaughter presiding. (Dkts. 81, 82, 83.) Plaintiff 4 Jonathan Flores appeared by and through his attorneys of record, Nina Sargsyan and 5 Ferdinand Phillip Peche, and Defendant United States of America appeared by and 6 through its attorneys of record, John Christopher Korevec and Christina Alejandra 7 Marquez. (Id.) On May 4, 2023, the court held a status conference on the matter, stated 8 its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 52(a), and found in favor of Defendant United States of America. (Dkt. 88.) On the 10 same day, the court ordered Defendant United States of America to lodge a proposed 11 judgment consistent with the court’s Statement of Decision within seven (7) days. (Id.) 12 On May 11, 2023, Defendant United States of America lodged a Proposed Judgment. 13 (Dkt. 89.) On May 12, 2023, the court entered an order indicating it had received the 14 Proposed Judgment from Defendant United States of America, and ordered Plaintiff 15 Jonathan Flores to either file “a statement of his objections to the Proposed Judgment or 16 a notice of non-opposition to the Proposed Judgment . . . within ten (10) days.” (Dkt. 17 90.) On May 22, 2023, Plaintiff Jonathan Flores filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to 18 Defendant’s Notice of Judgment. (Dkt. 91.) Therefore, Plaintiff Jonathan Flores’s claim 19 for negligence having been adjudicated in favor of Defendant United States of America, 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff 2 Jonathan Flores shall take nothing from Defendant United States of America on his 3 Complaint, and that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant United States of 4 America and against Plaintiff Jonathan Flores. Defendant United States of America shall 5 file any motion or application for costs within fourteen (14) days of the date this Order 6 was filed. Any motion or application for costs must comply with Local Rule 54-2. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Dated: May 23, 2023 HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?