Michael Rhambo v. Hakoub A. Shirvanian et al
Filing
9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unr uh Act and other state law claims asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than June 11, 2021. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of those claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (shb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
2:21-cv-04419-RSWL-AGRx
Title
Michael Rhambo v. Hakoub A. Shirvanian, et al.
Present: The
Honorable
Date
June 2, 2021
RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior U.S. District Judge
Catherine Jeang
Not Present
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF
SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIMS
The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims asserted in the Complaint.
Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than June 11, 2021.
Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further
warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of those claims pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 1367(c).
00
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
:
00
CMJ
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?