Fahren James v. City of Los Angeles et al
Filing
149
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, 148 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: THIS COURT, having considered the parties stipulation, orders thefollowing: This entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
JS -6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Case No. 2:21-cv-04525-CBM-ASx
11 FAHREN JAMES,
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
14 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal
entity; CHIEF MICHEL MOORE, in
15 his individual and official capacity;
OFFICER ALEX ZAMORA;
16 OFFICER KELEIGH EDWARDS;
OFFICER MIN CHUNG; SERGEANT
17 I CHRIS GIARGIARI; CAPTAIN III
SHANNON PAULSON; and DOES 1-8
18 inclusive,
Judge: Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall
12
13
v.
Defendants.
19
20
21
THIS COURT, having considered the parties’ stipulation, orders the
22 following:
23
This entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal
24 Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear their own
25 attorneys’ fees and costs.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27 Date : August 29, 2024
__
Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
4889-1702-4469 v1
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?