Fahren James v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 149

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, 148 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: THIS COURT, having considered the parties stipulation, orders thefollowing: This entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
JS -6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:21-cv-04525-CBM-ASx 11 FAHREN JAMES, Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; CHIEF MICHEL MOORE, in 15 his individual and official capacity; OFFICER ALEX ZAMORA; 16 OFFICER KELEIGH EDWARDS; OFFICER MIN CHUNG; SERGEANT 17 I CHRIS GIARGIARI; CAPTAIN III SHANNON PAULSON; and DOES 1-8 18 inclusive, Judge: Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall 12 13 v. Defendants. 19 20 21 THIS COURT, having considered the parties’ stipulation, orders the 22 following: 23 This entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear their own 25 attorneys’ fees and costs. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Date : August 29, 2024 __ Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES 4889-1702-4469 v1 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?