Ignacio Franco Palomar III v. U.S. District Court Central District of California

Filing 31

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Wesley L. Hsu for Report and Recommendation 30 . The Court affirms the Magistrate Judge's denial of petitioner's Motion to Stay/Amend (Docket No. 8), denies the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) on its merits, dismisses this action with prejudice (see document for further details). (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IGNACIO FRANCO PALOMAR, III, Petitioner, v. DAVID HOLBROOK, Respondent. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:21-cv-04688-WLH-JC ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and 17 accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 18 reflected in the March 11, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States 19 Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), affirms the Magistrate Judge’s 20 denial of petitioner’s Motion to Stay/Amend (Docket No. 8), denies the Petition 21 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) on its merits, dismisses this action with 22 prejudice, directs that Judgment be entered accordingly, and directs the Clerk to 23 serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for 24 respondent. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 DATED: August 28, 2024 28 ____________________________________ HON. WESLEY L. HSU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?