Ignacio Franco Palomar III v. U.S. District Court Central District of California
Filing
31
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Wesley L. Hsu for Report and Recommendation 30 . The Court affirms the Magistrate Judge's denial of petitioner's Motion to Stay/Amend (Docket No. 8), denies the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) on its merits, dismisses this action with prejudice (see document for further details). (hr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
IGNACIO FRANCO PALOMAR, III,
Petitioner,
v.
DAVID HOLBROOK,
Respondent.
_______________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:21-cv-04688-WLH-JC
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and
17 accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
18 reflected in the March 11, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States
19 Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), affirms the Magistrate Judge’s
20 denial of petitioner’s Motion to Stay/Amend (Docket No. 8), denies the Petition
21 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) on its merits, dismisses this action with
22 prejudice, directs that Judgment be entered accordingly, and directs the Clerk to
23 serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for
24 respondent.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27 DATED: August 28, 2024
28
____________________________________
HON. WESLEY L. HSU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?