Norman John Craig v. George Eskin et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/12/2021 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. (Henshaw, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/14/2021.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-01116 GGH P v. ORDER GEORGE ESKIN, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or submitted a request 19 to proceed in forma pauperis. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Santa Barbara Superior Court. ECF 20 21 No. 1 at 2. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where 22 petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s 2 application are more readily available in Santa Barbara County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 3 2241(d). 4 Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is 5 transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 6 Dated: July 12, 2021 7 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?