United States of America v. Internet Transaction Services, Inc.

Filing 123

FINAL ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO DEFENDANT GUY BENOIT filed by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant, his agents and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with him, who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined. SEE JUDGMENT FOR DETAILS. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (iv)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

WESTERN DIVISION

10
11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
INTERNET TRANSACTION
SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

Civil Case No. 21-6582-JFW (KSx)
FINAL ORDER OF PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AS TO
DEFENDANT GUY BENOIT

1

On August 13, 2021, the United States of America filed its Complaint for

2

Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions, and Other

3

Equitable Relief (the “Complaint”) against Defendant Guy Benoit (“Defendant

4

Benoit” or “Defendant”) and other named Defendants, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

5

1345, based on Defendants’ alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1344, and

6

1349. On August 20, 2021, the Court issued its Order granting the United States’

7

Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order. On September 2, 2021,

8

the Court issued a Preliminary Injunction.

9

On November 12, 2021, the United States served Defendant Benoit pursuant

10

to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 12, Defendant

11

Benoit’s answer was due on December 3, 2021. To date, Defendant Benoit has

12

failed to appear, answer, or otherwise defend this action. The United States

13

requested entry of default on January 10, 2022, and the clerk entered default on

14

March 10, 2022. On March 25, 2022, the government moved for default judgment

15

and the entry of a permanent injunction.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF DECISION

16
17
18
19
20
21

The Court, having considered the Complaint, the United States’ motion for
default judgment and other filings, and being otherwise advised, finds that:
A.

This Court has jurisdiction over the United States’ claims against

Defendant Benoit.
B.

Defendant Benoit has failed to answer or otherwise contest the

22

allegations in the Complaint. As such, for purposes of this litigation, those

23

allegations are taken as true. See Pepsico, Inc. v. California Sec. Cans, 238 F.

24

Supp. 2d 1172, 1175 (C.D. Cal. 2002) (citing TeleVideo Systems, Inc. v.

25

Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 917–18 (9th Cir. 1987)) (“Upon entry of default, the

26

well-pleaded allegations of the complaint relating to a defendant’s liability are

27

taken as true[.]”).

28

1

1

C.

The Complaint alleges, and Defendant Benoit has not contested, that

2

Defendant Benoit has engaged in and is likely to engage in acts or practices that

3

violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1344, and 1349. Further, the evidence submitted in this

4

matter, including the Declaration of Postal Inspector Ashlea Bowens (ECF No. 12-

5

1, the “Bowens Declaration”) and the exhibits thereto, demonstrates that Defendant

6

Benoit has led a multi-year fraud scheme through which Defendants have stolen

7

millions of dollars from American consumers and their federally insured financial

8

institutions by making unauthorized debits against consumers’ bank accounts. See,

9

e.g., Bowens Decl. ¶¶ 9, 12, 14–22, 71–73, 80–88. The evidence and pleadings

10

further reflect that he has repeatedly lied to consumer victims, banks, and payment

11

processors in furtherance of the scheme. See, e.g., id. ¶¶ 49–69, 80–86. The

12

evidence and pleadings reflect that many of these material misrepresentations in

13

furtherance of the scheme were made via interstate or international wire

14

transmission. See id.

15

D.

The evidence and admitted pleadings also reflect that assets held in

16

accounts registered to the Shell Entity Defendants (as defined below) are the

17

proceeds of bank and wire fraud, which Defendants including Benoit are likely to

18

attempt to alienate. See, e.g., Bowens Decl. ¶¶ 87–92, Exs. 25, 45.

19

E.

18 U.S.C. § 1345 provides this Court with broad power to order

20

injunctive relief designed to prevent future fraud and preclude the alienation of

21

stolen assets. In light of Defendant Benoit’s pattern of fraudulent conduct, the

22

Court finds it likely that absent a permanent injunction, he will resume fraudulent

23

activities. As such, permanent injunctive relief is necessary.
DEFINITIONS

24
25

For the purpose of this Order:

26

A.

27

“Asset” means any legal or equitable interest in, right to, or claim to,

any property, wherever located and by whomever held.

28

2

B.

1

“Corporate Defendants” means Defendants Internet Transaction

2

Services, Inc., Intertrans.com, Inc., and each of the “Shell Entity Defendants”

3

defined below.

4

C.

“Payment Processing Services” means handling credit card

5

transactions, debit card transactions, Automated Clearing House (ACH)

6

transactions, check transactions, money orders, or cash transactions.
D.

7
8

other entity.
E.

9
10

“Person” means any individual, corporation, a partnership, or any
“Receiver” means Thomas W. McNamara, and any deputy receivers

that shall be named by him.
F.

11

“Receivership Entities” means the Corporate Defendants, as well as

12

any other corporate entity that has conducted business related to the Corporate

13

Defendants’ participation in the scheme that is the subject of the Complaint in this

14

matter, including receipt of Assets derived from any activity that is the subject of

15

the Complaint in this matter, and that the Receiver determines is controlled or

16

owned by one or more of the Defendants.
G.

17

“Shell Entity Defendants” means Defendants Be a Kloud LLC; Blue

18

Water LLC; CBX International Inc. (Delaware); CBX International, Inc. (Florida);

19

Delta Cloud LLC; Dollar Web Sales LLC; ECloud Secure LLC; Eastgate View

20

LLC; I-Support Group LLC; My Kloud Box LLC; Newagecloudservices LLC;

21

NRG Support LLC; Silver Safe Box LLC; Silver Safe Box Inc.; Storage VPN

22

LLC; and VPN Me Now LLC.
ORDER

23
24
25
26

I.

PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant, his agents and attorneys, and all other

persons in active concert or participation with him, who receive actual notice of

27
28

3

1

this Order by personal service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and

2

enjoined from:

3

A.

4
5
6
7

Committing or conspiring to commit wire fraud, as defined by 18

U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349;
B.

Committing or conspiring to commit bank fraud, as defined by 18

U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 1349;
C.

Offering or purporting to offer, either personally or through a

8

corporate entity, cloud computing services, identity theft protection services, or

9

technology support services;

10

D.

Charging or debiting or causing others to charge or debit any person

11

or entity on behalf of any Shell Entity Defendant or for the purported purchase of

12

any Shell Entity Defendant’s services;

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

E.

Debiting or causing others to debit funds from any person’s bank

account without their prior authorization;
F.

Offering to provide or providing Payment Processing Services to any

person;
G.

Making, or assisting others in making any false or misleading

statement in order to obtain Payment Processing Services;
H.

Engaging in any measures to avoid fraud and risk monitoring

20

programs established by any financial institution, payment processors, or the

21

operators of any payment system, including by using sham transactions, such as

22

the “micro transactions” described in the Complaint, to reduce a bank account’s

23

return or chargeback rate, or by using shell corporations to open bank accounts or

24

payment processing accounts;

25

I.

Incorporating, creating, or causing any other person to incorporate or

26

create any corporate entity for the purpose of debiting funds from any person’s

27

bank account without their prior authorization;

28

4

J.

1

Causing any other person to incorporate or create any corporate entity

2

on Defendant’s behalf, with the intention that Defendant will covertly exercise

3

control over such corporate entity;
K.

4

Selling, renting, leasing, transferring, or otherwise disclosing, the

5

name, address, birth date, telephone number, email address, credit card number,

6

bank account number, Social Security number, IP address, or other financial or

7

identifying information of any person that any Defendant obtained in connection

8

with any activity that pertains to the subject matter of this Order or the Complaint

9

in this case; and

10

L.

Providing any support or substantial assistance to any person that

11

Defendant knows or has reason to know is engaged in any unlawful activity in

12

connection with payment processing.

13

II.

14

COOPERATION WITH RECEIVER AND ASSET FREEZE
For any Corporate Entities’ or Receivership Entities’ Assets within the

15

control of Defendant, his agents and attorneys, and/or all other persons in active

16

concert or participation with him, Defendant shall:

17

A.

Hold, preserve, and retain within his control and prohibit the

18

withdrawal, removal, alteration, assignment, transfer, pledge, encumbrance,

19

disbursement, dissipation, relinquishment, conversion, sale, or other disposal of

20

any Asset, as well as all Documents or other property related to such Assets,

21

except by further order of this Court or by direction of the Receiver;

22
23
24

B.

Fully cooperate with and assist the Receiver in taking and maintaining

possession, custody, or control of the Receivership Entities’ Assets; and
C.

To the extent he has not done so already, provide the United States,

25

within seven (7) days after entry of this Order or of obtaining direct or indirect

26

control over the Assets: (1) a list of all accounts, including savings, checking,

27

investment, and merchant accounts held in the name of a Corporate Entity or

28

Receivership Entity, for which the Defendant is an accountholder, signatory,
5

1

beneficiary, or over which the Defendant otherwise has control; (2) a list of any

2

other Assets held or controlled by the Defendant in the name of a Corporate Entity

3

or Receivership Entity; and (3) the balance of each such account, or a description

4

of the nature and value of each such Asset.

5

III.

Defendant shall clearly, conspicuously, and in writing disclose the existence

6
7

of this lawsuit (including the case number) and the contents of this Order to:
A.

8
9

DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS

Any bank to which Defendant, on behalf of any business, applies for

an account or other services; and
B.

10

Any merchant or payment processor with whom Defendant enters into

11

a contractual business relationship.

12

IV.

13
14
15

COMPLIANCE MONITORING
For a period of five (5) years after the date of entry of this Order, Defendant

must notify the United States if he:
A.

Creates, operates, is employed by, or otherwise becomes involved in

16

any business or entity that consults or provides advice regarding Payment

17

Processing Services;

18

B.

Creates, operates, is employed by, or otherwise becomes involved in

19

any business or entity that monitors return or chargeback rates for any other

20

business or corporate entity; and/or provides advice or consulting on how to lower

21

or manage return or chargeback rates for any business or corporate entity;

22

C.

Creates, operates, is employed by, or otherwise becomes involved in

23

any business or entity that purports to offer cloud computing services, identity theft

24

protection services, or technology support services;

25

D.

Creates, operates, or exercises control over any business entity,

26

whether newly formed or previously inactive. Defendant must also provide the

27

United States with a written statement disclosing: (1) the name of the business

28

entity; (2) the address and telephone number of the business entity; (3) the names
6

1

of the business entity’s officers, directors, principals, managers, and employees;

2

and (4) a detailed description of the business entity’s intended activities.

3

IV.

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this

5

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION

matter for all purposes.

6
7

SO ORDERED

8
9

DATED this 19TH day of April, 2022

10
11

________________________

12

United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

7