Maria Del Carmen Chinchillas et al v. Dap Products, Inc. et al

Filing 13

ORDER REMANDING ACTION 12 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Central District of California case number 2:21-cv-08181 styled Chinchillas et al. v. DAP Products, Inc., et al,. is hereby REMANDED to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 6 7 MARIA DEL CARMEN DIAZ CHINCHILLAS, individually and as 8 successor-in-interest to EDUARDO NAVARRETE MORENO, Deceased, 9 EDUARDO LORENZO NAVARRETE PALACIOS AND YOLANDA ARELY NAVARRETE PALACIOS, Individually, 10 ORDER REMANDING ACTION Plaintiffs, 11 12 Case No.: CV 21-8181-MWF (MAAx) vs. 13 DAP PRODUCTS, INC., et. al. 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 On November 12, 2021, the parties to the above-referenced action filed a 18 Stipulation to Remand Removed Action to State Court. The Court having reviewed 19 that stipulation and good cause appearing, orders as follows: 20 1. The Parties’ stipulation is GRANTED; 21 2. Central District of California case number 2:21-cv-08181 styled 22 Chinchillas et al. v. DAP Products, Inc., et al,. is hereby REMANDED to the Los 23 Angeles County Superior Court. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: November 15, 2021 27 28 _______________________________ MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this the 12th day of November 2021, the foregoing 3 Order was filed electronically via the Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case 4 Filing system and served upon all counsel of record via the same. 5 6 7 fçÄä|t UA \ãt| 8 Sylvia B. Iwai 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?