Michael J. Libman et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 116

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PROOFS OF SERVICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin.*See Order for Details.* (iv)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV 21-9455 FMO (MAAx)

Title

Michael J. Libman, et al. v. United States of America, et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

April 5, 2022

Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge

Gabriela Garcia

None

None

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Tape No.

Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorney Present for Defendant(s):

None Present

None Present

Proceedings:

(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Proofs of Service

Having reviewed plaintiffs’ proofs of service with respect to defendants Andrew Civetti
(“Civetti”), Jim Doe, John Doe, Nicola Hannah (“Hannah”), Mack Eric Jenkins (“Jenkins”), Julienne
Mayfield (“Mayfield”), Melissa J. Mills (“Mills”), and Thomas Ruscitti (“Ruscitti”), and waiver of
service with respect to Mills, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs’ proofs of service filed with respect to Civetti (Document Nos. 55 and 82),
Mayfield (Document Nos. 56 and 82), John Doe (Document Nos. 57 and 82), Ruscitti
(Document Nos. 58 and 82), Jim Doe (Document Nos. 59 and 82), Jenkins (Document Nos.
60 and 80), Hannah (Document Nos. 61 and 81), and Mills (Document No. 82) are hereby
stricken for failure to comply with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2. Plaintiffs’ waiver of service filed with respect to Mills (Document No. 40) is hereby
stricken as the form is incomplete.
3. Plaintiff shall serve Civetti, Jim Doe, John Doe, Hannah, Jenkins, Mayfield, Mills, and
Ruscitti, and file valid proofs of service in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure no later than April 19, 2022. The court is not inclined to grant any extensions of this
deadline.
4. Failure to file valid proof(s) of service by the deadline set forth above will result in the
defendant(s) being dismissed from the action without prejudice for failure to effect service, for lack
of prosecution and/or failure to comply with the orders of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 & 41(b);
Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).

00
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

:

00

gga

Page 1 of 1